Suppr超能文献

昂丹司琼8毫克口服片剂与两种临时配制的16毫克栓剂的相对生物利用度:制剂和性别差异。

Relative bioavailability of ondansetron 8-mg oral tablets versus two extemporaneous 16-mg suppositories: formulation and gender differences.

作者信息

Jann M W, ZumBrunnen T L, Tenjarla S N, Ward E S, Weidler D J

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, Mercer University, Southern School of Pharmacy, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 1998 Mar-Apr;18(2):288-94.

PMID:9545148
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare the relative bioavailability of two 16-mg extemporaneously prepared suppository formulations with that of an 8-mg commercially available oral tablet.

DESIGN

Prospective, crossover bioavailability study.

SETTING

Inpatient clinical research center.

SUBJECTS

Sixteen young, nonsmoking, healthy volunteers.

INTERVENTIONS

Blood samples were obtained 24 and 48 hours after administration of an 8-mg oral ondansetron tablet and 16-mg suppository, respectively. Two 16-mg suppository formulations were compounded using commercially available Fattibase and Polybase.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ondansetron was well absorbed by both routes of administration. The following pharmacokinetic parameters (mean+/-SEM) were obtained for the 8-mg tablet, 16-mg Fattibase suppository, and 16-mg Polybase suppository, respectively: area under the curve (AUC) in men 154.2+/-21.77, 253.4+/-72.3, 304.8+/-62.2 ng x hr/ml; AUC in women 353.6+/-32.7, 561.6+/-103.6, and 768.7+/-117.9 ng x hr/ml; maximum concentration (Cmax) in men 45.5+/-7.0, 40.6+/-10.4, and 51.2+/-6.7 ng/ml; Cmax in women 51.4+/-.8, 47.1+/-3.9, and 82.9+/-6.6 ng/ml. Times to Cmax (Tmax; mean+/-SEM) for men were 1.5+/-0.3, 4.4+/-0.5, and 2.9+/-0.3 hours; Tmax for women were 1.8+/-0.3, 4.1+/-0.4, and 4.4+/-0.6 hours for the three formulations, respectively. Women had a consistently higher AUC for all three formulations than men (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

With the exception of the 16-mg Polybase formulation in women, the two suppositories closely approximated the pharmacokinetics of the 8-mg oral tablet. These results suggest that gender may be a significant factor in ondansetron's disposition.

摘要

研究目的

比较两种16毫克临时配制栓剂制剂与8毫克市售口服片剂的相对生物利用度。

设计

前瞻性交叉生物利用度研究。

地点

住院临床研究中心。

受试者

16名年轻、不吸烟的健康志愿者。

干预措施

分别在服用8毫克口服昂丹司琼片和16毫克栓剂后24小时和48小时采集血样。两种16毫克栓剂制剂使用市售的脂肪酸基质和聚乙二醇基质配制。

测量与主要结果

昂丹司琼通过两种给药途径均吸收良好。分别获得了8毫克片剂、16毫克脂肪酸基质栓剂和16毫克聚乙二醇基质栓剂的以下药代动力学参数(均值±标准误):男性的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为154.2±21.77、253.4±72.3、304.8±62.2纳克·小时/毫升;女性的AUC分别为353.6±32.7、561.6±103.6、768.7±117.9纳克·小时/毫升;男性的最大浓度(Cmax)分别为45.5±7.0、40.6±10.4、51.2±6.7纳克/毫升;女性的Cmax分别为51.4±0.8、47.1±3.9、82.9±6.6纳克/毫升。三种制剂男性达到Cmax的时间(Tmax;均值±标准误)分别为1.5±0.3、4.4±0.5、2.9±0.3小时;女性的Tmax分别为1.8±0.3、4.1±0.4、4.4±0.6小时。所有三种制剂女性的AUC始终高于男性(p<0.05)。

结论

除女性的16毫克聚乙二醇基质制剂外,两种栓剂的药代动力学与8毫克口服片剂相近。这些结果表明性别可能是昂丹司琼处置的一个重要因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验