Doi N
Department of Basic Research, Research Institute of Tuberculosis, Japan Anti-Tuberculosis Association, Tokyo, Japan.
Kekkaku. 1998 Feb;73(2):53-64.
This study aims to compare in vivo activity of benzoxazinorifamycin KRM-1648 (KRM) with those rifampicin (RFP) and rifabutin (RBT) against experimental murine tuberculosis.
Mice were infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis or M. bovis by the intratracheal (i.t.) or intravenous (i.v.) routes, and treated for 10 days with various doses of each drug starting from the 9th or 11th day after the TB-infection.
(A) A rapid test for in vivo evaluation of three rifamycins was conducted by examining the survival days of treated mice infected with 106 cfu of M. bovis Ravenel. Mice treated with KRM exhibited 2.13.7 times longer survival times, in comparison with those treated with RFP or RBT. (B) In the i.t.-model of M. bovis Ravenel infection, three rifamycin derivatives gave "distinctive dose-response curves" in the correlation of dose sizes with the mean survival times or "log10CFU/lungs reductions". (C) In M. tuberculosis Kurono infection models, the ranking of the anti-TB activity of the three rifamycins in each organ was as follows: i.t.-and i.v.-lungs: KRM >> RFP not equal to RBT, i.v.-spleen: KRM not equal to RBT > RFP, i.v.-liver: KRM not equal to RBT > RFP. (D) Based on the results of "log10CFU reduction" in different organs in M. tuberculosis Kurono infection models, "characteristic in vivo activity patterns of each rifamycin" were obtained. (E) The therapeutic efficacy of KRM in lungs was greater than in spleen and liver with any dose. In contrast, RBT exhibited more remarkable in vivo activity in the spleen and liver than in lungs.
The prominent in vivo activity of KRM may allow small dose for effective therapy; 1/3 dose or less in comparison with those of RFP or RBT, or intermittent therapy of tuberculosis.
本研究旨在比较苯并恶嗪诺利福霉素KRM - 1648(KRM)与利福平(RFP)和利福布汀(RBT)在实验性小鼠结核病模型中的体内活性。
通过气管内(i.t.)或静脉内(i.v.)途径用结核分枝杆菌或牛分枝杆菌感染小鼠,并在结核感染后的第9天或第11天开始用不同剂量的每种药物治疗10天。
(A)通过检查感染106 cfu牛分枝杆菌Ravenel的治疗小鼠的存活天数,对三种利福霉素进行了体内快速评估。与用RFP或RBT治疗的小鼠相比,用KRM治疗的小鼠存活时间延长了2.1 - 3.7倍。(B)在牛分枝杆菌Ravenel感染的i.t.模型中,三种利福霉素衍生物在剂量大小与平均存活时间或“log10CFU/肺减少量”的相关性方面给出了“独特的剂量反应曲线”。(C)在结核分枝杆菌Kurono感染模型中,三种利福霉素在每个器官中的抗结核活性排名如下:i.t.和i.v.肺:KRM >> RFP ≠ RBT,i.v.脾:KRM ≠ RBT > RFP,i.v.肝:KRM ≠ RBT > RFP。(D)基于结核分枝杆菌Kurono感染模型中不同器官的“log10CFU减少”结果,获得了“每种利福霉素的特征性体内活性模式”。(E)KRM在肺部的治疗效果在任何剂量下都大于在脾脏和肝脏中的效果。相比之下,RBT在脾脏和肝脏中表现出比在肺部更显著的体内活性。
KRM突出的体内活性可能允许使用小剂量进行有效治疗;与RFP或RBT相比剂量为其1/3或更低,或用于结核病的间歇治疗。