Fritz U B, Finger W J, Uno S
University of Cologne, School of Dentistry, Department of Operative Dentistry, Germany.
Am J Dent. 1996 Dec;9(6):253-8.
To investigate the marginal adaptation of resin-modified glass ionomer cements in dentin cavities placed with or without additional application of resin bonding systems.
Three resin-modified materials (Fuji II LC, Photac-Fil, Vitremer), one compomer (Dyract) and as reference an adhesively bonded resin composite system (Gluma CPS-Pekafill) were used. Flat peripheral dentin surfaces on human molar teeth were produced by wet grinding on SiC paper. Cylindrical cavities, 3.5 mm wide, were prepared in these dentin areas and restored with the individual materials. Sixty cavities were pretreated and restored as requested by the respective manufacturers. Following water storage of the specimens for 15 minutes or 24 hours, excess was gently removed by wet grinding for microscopic inspection of the marginal area. Additionally, in 30 cavities an experimental one-component adhesive resin system, a proprietary dimethacrylate and HEMA mixture dissolved in acetone, was combined with each of the restoratives for evaluation after 15-minutes water storage. Finally, in six cavities each, Dyract was combined with Prime and Bond 2.0, and Vitremer with Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus for assessment after 15 minutes. Maximum marginal gap widths (MGW) were measured. One-way ANOVA by ranks (Kruskal-Wallis-Test) followed by Wilcoxon's Two-Sample test were used to study the statistical difference of MGW among the treatment groups at a rejection level P = 0.05.
Neither the conventionally placed material systems nor the restorations in combination with adhesives showed consistently gap-free margins after 15-minute water storage. After 24-hour storage with Vitremer 4 of the 6 restorations were gap-free, whereas with all other materials only perfect margins were registered. There was, however, no significant difference between the groups. Application of the experimental and/or the specific resin bonding agents had no effect on early MGW except for the Photac-Fil group, which was significantly reduced.
研究在有或没有额外应用树脂粘结系统的情况下,树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀在牙本质窝洞中的边缘适应性。
使用三种树脂改性材料(富士II LC、Photac-Fil、Vitremer)、一种复合体(Dyract)以及作为对照的粘结性树脂复合系统(Gluma CPS-Pekafill)。通过在碳化硅纸上湿磨制备人磨牙的平坦周边牙本质表面。在这些牙本质区域制备3.5毫米宽的圆柱形窝洞,并用相应材料进行修复。按照各制造商的要求对60个窝洞进行预处理和修复。将标本储存于水中15分钟或24小时后,通过湿磨轻轻去除多余部分,以便对边缘区域进行显微镜检查。此外,在30个窝洞中,将一种实验性单组分粘结性树脂系统(一种溶解于丙酮的专利二甲基丙烯酸酯和甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯混合物)与每种修复材料联合使用,在储存于水中15分钟后进行评估。最后,在每组6个窝洞中,将Dyract与Prime and Bond 2.0联合使用,将Vitremer与Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus联合使用,在15分钟后进行评估。测量最大边缘间隙宽度(MGW)。采用秩次单向方差分析(Kruskal-Wallis检验),随后进行Wilcoxon双样本检验,以研究各治疗组在P = 0.05的拒绝水平下MGW的统计学差异。
在储存于水中15分钟后,无论是传统放置的材料系统还是与粘结剂联合使用的修复体,均未显示出始终无间隙的边缘。在储存于水中24小时后,使用Vitremer的6个修复体中有4个边缘无间隙,而使用所有其他材料时仅记录到完美边缘。然而,各组之间无显著差异。除Photac-Fil组的MGW显著降低外,实验性和/或特定树脂粘结剂的应用对早期MGW无影响。