Mannion R J, Doubell T P, Gill H, Woolf C J
Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, University College London, United Kingdom.
J Comp Neurol. 1998 Apr 6;393(2):135-44. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19980406)393:2<135::aid-cne1>3.0.co;2-3.
The mechanism by which A-fibres sprout into lamina II of the dorsal horn of the adult rat after peripheral nerve injury, a region which normally receives input from noci- and thermoreceptive C-fibres alone, is not known. Recent findings indicating that selective C-fibre injury and subsequent degenerative changes in this region are sufficient to induce sprouting of uninjured A-fibres have raised the possibility that the structural reorganisation of A-fibre terminals is an example of collateral sprouting, in that deafferentation of C-fibre terminals alone in lamina II may be sufficient to cause A-fibre sprouting. Primary afferents of the sciatic nerve have their cell bodies located predominantly in the L4 and L5 dorsal root ganglia (DRGs), and the A-fibres of each DRG have central termination fields that show an extensive rostrocaudal overlap in lamina III in the L4 and L5 spinal segments. In this study, we have found that C-fibres from either DRG have central terminal fields that overlap much less in lamina II than A-fibres in lamina III. We have exploited this differential terminal organisation to produce deafferentation in lamina II of the L5 spinal segment, by an L5 rhizotomy, and then test whether A-fibres of the intact L4 dorsal root ganglion, which terminate within the L5 segment, sprout into the denervated lamina II in the L5 spinal segment. Neither intact nor peripherally injured A-fibres were seen to sprout into denervated lamina II after L5 rhizotomy. Sprouting was only ever seen into regions of lamina II containing the terminals of peripherally injured C-fibres. Therefore, it seems that the creation of synaptic space within lamina II is not the explanation for A-fibre sprouting after peripheral nerve section or crush, emphasising that injury-induced changes in C-fibres and subsequent chemotrophic effects in the superficial dorsal horn are the likely explanation.
成年大鼠周围神经损伤后,A纤维向背角板层II(该区域正常情况下仅接受伤害性和温度感受性C纤维的输入)生长的机制尚不清楚。最近的研究结果表明,该区域的选择性C纤维损伤及随后的退行性变化足以诱导未损伤的A纤维生长,这增加了A纤维终末结构重组是侧支发芽的一个例子的可能性,因为仅板层II中C纤维终末的去传入可能足以导致A纤维生长。坐骨神经的初级传入神经元的细胞体主要位于L4和L5背根神经节(DRG),每个DRG的A纤维具有中央终末场,在L4和L5脊髓节段的板层III中显示出广泛的前后重叠。在本研究中,我们发现来自任一DRG的C纤维在板层II中的中央终末场重叠程度远小于板层III中的A纤维。我们利用这种不同的终末组织,通过L5神经根切断术使L5脊髓节段的板层II去传入,然后测试完整的L4背根神经节中终止于L5节段的A纤维是否会向L5脊髓节段中去神经支配的板层II生长。L5神经根切断术后,未观察到完整的或周围神经损伤的A纤维向去神经支配的板层II生长。仅在含有周围神经损伤的C纤维终末的板层II区域观察到生长。因此,似乎板层II内突触空间的形成并不能解释周围神经切断或挤压后A纤维的生长,这强调了损伤诱导的C纤维变化以及随后在背角浅层的化学营养作用可能是其原因。