Lahey B B, Loeber R, Quay H C, Applegate B, Shaffer D, Waldman I, Hart E L, McBurnett K, Frick P J, Jensen P S, Dulcan M K, Canino G, Bird H R
Department of Psychiatry, University of Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1998 Apr;37(4):435-42. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199804000-00022.
To present data from the DSM-IV field trials that led to the distinction between subtypes of conduct disorder (CD) that emerge in childhood or adolescence. In addition, data from a household sample were used to attempt to cross-validate these findings.
Differences between youths who met criteria for the two subtypes of CD were examined in the field trials sample of 440 youths aged 4 through 17 years and in a household sample of 1,285 youths aged 9 through 17 years.
In both samples, there was a steep decline in aggression occurring around an age of onset of 10 years, but the number of nonaggressive behaviors was unrelated to the age of onset of CD. In the field trials sample, youths who met criteria for the adolescent-onset type were more likely to be girls, less likely to meet criteria for oppositional defiant disorder, and less likely to have a family history of antisocial behavior than the childhood-onset type, but these latter findings were not confirmed in the household sample.
The DSM-IV approach to subtyping CD distinguishes subgroups that differ markedly in level of physical aggression. The advantages of a developmental approach to subtyping are discussed.
呈现来自《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)现场试验的数据,这些数据促成了儿童期或青少年期出现的品行障碍(CD)亚型之间的区分。此外,还使用了来自家庭样本的数据来尝试对这些发现进行交叉验证。
在440名年龄在4至17岁的青少年现场试验样本以及1285名年龄在9至17岁的青少年家庭样本中,对符合两种CD亚型标准的青少年之间的差异进行了检查。
在两个样本中,攻击行为在10岁左右的发病年龄出现急剧下降,但非攻击性行为的数量与CD的发病年龄无关。在现场试验样本中,符合青少年起病型标准的青少年比儿童起病型更可能是女孩,更不可能符合对立违抗障碍的标准,并且更不可能有反社会行为的家族史,但后一项发现未在家庭样本中得到证实。
DSM-IV对CD进行亚型分类的方法区分了身体攻击水平明显不同的亚组。讨论了采用发展方法进行亚型分类的优势。