• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于州一级“消费者赋权”的全国性调查。

A national survey of "consumer empowerment" at the state level.

作者信息

Geller J L, Brown J M, Fisher W H, Grudzinskas A J, Manning T D

机构信息

University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Apr;49(4):498-503. doi: 10.1176/ps.49.4.498.

DOI:10.1176/ps.49.4.498
PMID:9550240
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A national survey was conducted to determine the extent of consumer empowerment in the public mental health system.

METHODS

A questionnaire was sent to mental health authorities in all U.S. states and territories asking whether consumer empowerment or responsibility was defined in statutes, regulations, or policies and whether consumers or family members were employed in central or field offices of the authority. A rating scale measured the extent of consumer empowerment, and correlations were examined between this rating and other variables.

RESULTS

The survey achieved a 100 percent response rate. Twenty-two states (39 percent) addressed consumer empowerment and 16 (28 percent) consumer responsibility in a statute, regulation, or policy. Twenty-seven states (48 percent) had paid positions for consumers in central offices, and three (5 percent) had such positions for family members. Half the states had paid positions for consumers in field offices, and 12 states (24 percent) had such positions for family members. The extent of a state's consumer empowerment had no relationship to region of the country or the state's mental health budget. A significant positive relationship was found between extent of empowerment and the size of the state's population and the quality of its mental health services.

CONCLUSIONS

State mental health authorities vary widely in their direct involvement with consumer empowerment. Results indicate that mental health authorities need to make a greater commitment to the achievement of such empowerment if it is to become a meaningful part of government involvement with mental health services.

摘要

目的

开展一项全国性调查,以确定公共精神卫生系统中消费者赋权的程度。

方法

向美国所有州和领地的精神卫生当局发送一份调查问卷,询问在法规、条例或政策中是否对消费者赋权或责任进行了界定,以及当局的中央或地区办公室是否聘用了消费者或家庭成员。用一个评分量表来衡量消费者赋权的程度,并检验该评分与其他变量之间的相关性。

结果

调查的回复率达到了100%。22个州(39%)在法规、条例或政策中涉及了消费者赋权,16个州(28%)涉及了消费者责任。27个州(48%)在中央办公室为消费者设有带薪职位,3个州(5%)为家庭成员设有此类职位。一半的州在地区办公室为消费者设有带薪职位,12个州(24%)为家庭成员设有此类职位。一个州的消费者赋权程度与该国的地区或该州的精神卫生预算无关。在赋权程度与该州人口规模及其精神卫生服务质量之间发现了显著的正相关关系。

结论

各州精神卫生当局在直接参与消费者赋权方面差异很大。结果表明,如果消费者赋权要成为政府参与精神卫生服务的一个有意义的部分,精神卫生当局需要在实现这种赋权方面做出更大的承诺。

相似文献

1
A national survey of "consumer empowerment" at the state level.一项关于州一级“消费者赋权”的全国性调查。
Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Apr;49(4):498-503. doi: 10.1176/ps.49.4.498.
2
Set up to fail? Consumer participation in the mental health service system.注定失败?消费者参与心理健康服务体系。
Australas Psychiatry. 2008 Oct;16(5):348-53. doi: 10.1080/10398560802047367.
3
A consumer-constructed scale to measure empowerment among users of mental health services.一个由消费者构建的量表,用于测量心理健康服务使用者的赋权程度。
Psychiatr Serv. 1997 Aug;48(8):1042-7. doi: 10.1176/ps.48.8.1042.
4
Utilization of psychologists in positions of responsibility in public mental health programs: a national survey.公共心理健康项目中担任责任职位的心理学家的使用情况:一项全国性调查。
Am Psychol. 1970 Oct;25(10):953-8.
5
Understanding the Role of Allies in Systemic Consumer Empowerment: A Literature Review.理解盟友在系统性消费者赋权中的作用:文献综述。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Apr;40(4):354-361. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2018.1553004. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
6
Consumer empowerment in the mental health field.心理健康领域的消费者赋权。
Can J Commun Ment Health. 1996 Fall;15(2):69-85. doi: 10.7870/cjcmh-1996-0011.
7
Patient empowerment as a component of health system reforms: rights, benefits and vested interests.患者赋权作为卫生系统改革的组成部分:权利、利益和既得利益。
Intern Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;7(2):183-7. doi: 10.1007/s11739-012-0757-1. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
8
Rhetoric of representation: the disempowerment and empowerment of consumer leaders.表征的修辞:消费者领袖的被剥夺权力与赋权
Health Promot Int. 2019 Feb 1;34(1):166-174. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax070.
9
Recovery-promoting professional competencies: perspectives of mental health consumers, consumer-providers and providers.促进康复的专业能力:精神健康消费者、消费者提供者和提供者的观点。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2011 Winter;34(3):177-85. doi: 10.2975/34.3.2011.177.185.
10
The patient as a policy factor: a historical case study of the consumer/survivor movement in mental health.作为政策因素的患者:心理健康领域消费者/幸存者运动的历史案例研究
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 May-Jun;25(3):720-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.25.3.720.

引用本文的文献

1
Consumers' Suggestions for Improving the Mental Healthcare System: Options, Autonomy, and Respect.消费者对改善精神卫生保健系统的建议:选择、自主权和尊重。
Community Ment Health J. 2019 Aug;55(6):916-923. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00423-7. Epub 2019 Jun 7.
2
Service user involvement in mental health care: an evolutionary concept analysis.服务使用者参与精神卫生保健:一项概念演变分析
Health Expect. 2016 Apr;19(2):209-21. doi: 10.1111/hex.12353. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
3
Consumer-providers of care for adult clients of statutory mental health services.
法定心理健康服务成年客户的护理消费者提供者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Mar 28;2013(3):CD004807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004807.pub2.
4
Trust, choice and power in mental health: a literature review.心理健康中的信任、选择与权力:文献综述
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006 Nov;41(11):843-52. doi: 10.1007/s00127-006-0123-6. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
5
Consumer and case manager perspectives of service empowerment: relationship to mental health recovery.消费者和个案管理者对服务赋权的看法:与心理健康康复的关系。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr;33(2):142-55. doi: 10.1007/s11414-006-9012-8.
6
The responsiveness of State Mental Health Authorities to parents with mental illness.国家心理健康机构对患有精神疾病的父母的响应能力。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2004 Sep;32(1):31-48. doi: 10.1023/b:apih.0000039661.54974.ce.
7
Managed care in the public sector: lessons learned from the Los Angeles PARTNERS program.公共部门的管理式医疗:从洛杉矶合作伙伴项目中吸取的经验教训。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2001 May;28(2):155-63. doi: 10.1007/BF02287458.
8
Identifying clinical competencies that support rehabilitation and empowerment in individuals with severe mental illness.识别支持重度精神疾病患者康复与赋权的临床能力。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2000 Aug;27(3):321-33. doi: 10.1007/BF02291743.