Unscientific practice flourishes in science.
作者信息
Smith R
出版信息
BMJ. 1998 Apr 4;316(7137):1036. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7137.1036.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Unscientific practice flourishes in science.不科学的做法在科学领域盛行。
BMJ. 1998 Apr 4;316(7137):1036. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7137.1036.
2
Impact factors: target the funding bodies.影响因素：针对资助机构。
Nature. 2003 Jun 5;423(6940):585. doi: 10.1038/423585b.
3
Peer review: recognition via year-end statements.同行评审：通过年终报表进行认可。
Nature. 2003 May 8;423(6936):116. doi: 10.1038/423116b.
4
Scandals stem from the low priority of peer review.丑闻源于同行评审的低优先级。
Nature. 2004 Jan 15;427(6971):196. doi: 10.1038/427196a.
5
Impact factors reward and promote excellence.影响因子奖励并促进卓越。
Nature. 2003 Jul 31;424(6948):487. doi: 10.1038/424487a.
6
The system rewards a dishonest approach.该系统鼓励不诚实的做法。
Nature. 2003 May 29;423(6939):480; discussion 480. doi: 10.1038/423480a.
7
Not-so-deep impact.不太深刻的影响。
Nature. 2005 Jun 23;435(7045):1003-4. doi: 10.1038/4351003b.
8
Reviewers' reports should in turn be peer reviewed.审稿人的报告反过来也应该接受同行评审。
Nature. 2006 Jul 6;442(7098):26. doi: 10.1038/442026a.
9
The secrets of success.成功的秘诀。
Nature. 2004 Nov 11;432(7014):253. doi: 10.1038/nj7014-253a.
10
Peer review could be improved by market forces.同行评审可以通过市场力量得到改善。
Nature. 2006 Feb 16;439(7078):782. doi: 10.1038/439782c.
引用本文的文献
1
Journals publishing bio-medicolegal research in Europe.在欧洲出版生物医学法律研究的期刊。
Int J Legal Med. 2012 Jan;126(1):129-37. doi: 10.1007/s00414-011-0620-3. Epub 2011 Sep 22.
2
European National Society Cardiovascular Journals: Background, rationale and mission statement of the 'Editors' Club' (Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology).欧洲国家心血管期刊学会：“编辑俱乐部”（欧洲心脏病学会工作组）的背景、原理和使命声明。
Neth Heart J. 2010 Apr;18(4):202-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03091762.
3
System crash.系统崩溃。
EMBO Rep. 2010 Feb;11(2):86-9. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.278. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
4
European National Society Cardiovascular Journals: Background, rationale and mission statement of the 'Editors' Club' (Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology).欧洲国家心血管期刊学会：“编辑俱乐部”（欧洲心脏病学会工作组）的背景、基本原理和使命声明。
Neth Heart J. 2008 Jun;16(6):211-6. doi: 10.1007/BF03086147.
5
At the frontier of biomedical publication: Chicago 2005.生物医学出版前沿：2005年芝加哥
BMJ. 2005 Oct 8;331(7520):838-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.331.7520.838.
6
Building family/general practice research capacity.建设家庭/全科医疗研究能力。
Ann Fam Med. 2004 May 26;2 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S35-40. doi: 10.1370/afm.146.
7
Quality of impact factors of general medical journals. Quality matters--and the choice of indicator matters too.综合医学期刊影响因子的质量。质量很重要——指标的选择也很重要。
BMJ. 2003 Apr 26;326(7395):931. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7395.931.
8
Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise: reflections on the troubled question of authorship.出版伦理与研究评估活动：对备受困扰的作者身份问题的思考
J Med Ethics. 2000 Dec;26(6):422-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.6.422.
9
Drug treatments for schizophrenia.精神分裂症的药物治疗
Qual Health Care. 2000 Mar;9(1):73-9. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.1.73.
本文引用的文献
1
Misleading, unscientific, and unjust: the United Kingdom's research assessment exercise.具有误导性、不科学且不公正：英国的研究评估活动。
BMJ. 1998 Apr 4;316(7137):1079-82. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7137.1079.
2
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.为何不应使用期刊影响因子来评估研究。
BMJ. 1997 Feb 15;314(7079):498-502. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497.
3
How can impact factors be improved?影响因素如何才能得到改善？
BMJ. 1996 Aug 17;313(7054):411-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7054.411.
Zotero 插件