• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly.

作者信息

Cornell C N, Levine D, O'Doherty J, Lyden J

机构信息

Combined Fracture Service, New York Hospital, NY, USA.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Mar(348):67-71.

PMID:9553535
Abstract

This paper presents the short term results of an ongoing prospective randomized trial comparing a cemented unipolar with a cemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Forty-seven patients with an average age of 77 years completed 6-month followup. Outcomes at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months were assessed by completion of a patient oriented hip outcome instrument and by functional tests of walking speed and endurance. No differences in the postoperative complication rates or lengths of hospitalization were seen between the two groups. Patients treated with a bipolar hemiarthroplasty had greater range of hip motion in rotation and abduction and had faster walking speeds. However, no differences in hip rating outcomes were found. These early results suggest that use of the less expensive unipolar prosthesis for hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture may be justified in the elderly.

摘要

相似文献

1
Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Mar(348):67-71.
2
Outcome after hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly.老年股骨颈骨折半髋关节置换术后的结果
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Mar(348):51-8.
3
Uni- and bipolar hemiarthroplasty with a modern cemented femoral component provides elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures with equal functional outcome and survivorship at medium-term follow-up.采用现代骨水泥型股骨假体的单极和双极半髋关节置换术,在中期随访时为老年移位型股骨颈骨折患者提供了同等的功能结果和生存率。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Sep;134(9):1251-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2053-1. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
4
Total hip arthroplasty: optimal treatment for displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.全髋关节置换术:老年患者移位型股骨颈骨折的最佳治疗方法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Dec(429):43-8.
5
Does a bipolar hemiprosthesis offer advantages for elderly patients with neck of femur fracture? A clinical trial with 261 patients.双极半髋关节假体对老年股骨颈骨折患者是否具有优势?一项针对261例患者的临床试验。
ANZ J Surg. 2013 Apr;83(4):249-54. doi: 10.1111/ans.12048. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
6
Bipolar hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular femoral neck fractures in elderly patients.老年患者囊内股骨颈骨折的双极半髋关节置换术
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013 Dec;21(3):313-6. doi: 10.1177/230949901302100310.
7
Unipolar versus bipolar uncemented hemiarthroplasty for elderly patients with displaced intracapsular femoral neck fractures.单极与双极非骨水泥型半髋关节置换术治疗老年移位型囊内股骨颈骨折
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2011 Apr;19(1):8-12. doi: 10.1177/230949901101900103.
8
Hemiarthroplasty of the hip with and without cement: a randomized clinical trial.髋关节骨水泥型和非骨水泥型半髋关节置换术:一项随机临床试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Apr 4;94(7):577-83. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00006.
9
Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures: a prospective randomized trial with early follow-up.骨水泥型与非骨水泥型人工股骨头置换术治疗移位型股骨颈骨折:一项早期随访的前瞻性随机试验。
J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Mar;26(3):135-40. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318238b7a5.
10
Unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly?老年股骨颈骨折行单极或双极半髋关节置换术?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Sep(414):259-65. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000081938.75404.09.

引用本文的文献

1
Is the use of bipolar hemiarthroplasty over monopolar hemiarthroplasty justified? A propensity score-weighted analysis of a multicentre randomized controlled trial.与单极半关节置换术相比,双极半关节置换术的应用是否合理?一项多中心随机对照试验的倾向评分加权分析。
Bone Jt Open. 2023 May 19;4(5):370-377. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.45.BJO-2023-0026.R1.
2
Total hip arthroplasty compared to bipolar and unipolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced hip fractures in the elderly: a Bayesian network meta-analysis.全髋关节置换术与双极和单极半髋关节置换术治疗老年移位性髋部骨折的比较:贝叶斯网状荟萃分析。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2022 Aug;48(4):2655-2666. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-01905-2. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
3
Arthroplasties for hip fracture in adults.
成人髋部骨折的关节成形术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 14;2(2):CD013410. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013410.pub2.
4
Surgical interventions for treating intracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis.老年人囊内型髋部骨折的手术治疗:网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 14;2(2):CD013404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013404.pub2.
5
Cemented unipolar or modular bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in elderly patients - which is better?骨水泥型单极或组合式双极半髋关节置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折——哪种更好?
Int J Burns Trauma. 2021 Dec 15;11(6):447-455. eCollection 2021.
6
Joint motion of bipolar hemiarthroplasty in routine hip functional movements: a dynamic motion study.双极半髋关节置换术后在常规髋关节功能运动中的联合运动:一项动态运动研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Nov 10;21(1):731. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03749-6.
7
Geriatric Femoral Neck Fractures: Hemiarthroplasty Implant Trends Across a Health System From 2006 to 2018.老年股骨颈骨折:2006年至2018年整个医疗系统半髋关节置换植入物的发展趋势
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2020 Jun 10;11:2151459320927378. doi: 10.1177/2151459320927378. eCollection 2020.
8
Bipolar versus monopolar hemiarthroplasty for displaced femur neck fractures: a meta-analysis study.双极与单极半髋关节置换治疗移位股骨颈骨折:一项荟萃分析研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2020 Apr;30(3):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02600-6. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
9
Responsiveness of the PROMIS and FAAM Instruments in Foot and Ankle Orthopedic Population.PROMIS 和 FAAM 工具在足踝矫形人群中的反应性。
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Jan;40(1):56-64. doi: 10.1177/1071100718799758. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
10
PROMIS and FAAM Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Foot and Ankle Orthopedics.PROMIS 和 FAAM 在足踝矫形骨科中的最小临床重要差异。
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Jan;40(1):65-73. doi: 10.1177/1071100718800304. Epub 2018 Oct 4.