Suppr超能文献

福赛斯坦纳菌和牙龈卟啉单胞菌的快速椅旁DNA探针检测

Rapid chair-side DNA probe assay of Bacteroides forsythus and Porphyromonas gingivalis.

作者信息

Tanner A C, Maiden M F, Zambon J J, Thoren G S, Kent R L

机构信息

Forsyth Dental Center, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

J Periodontal Res. 1998 Feb;33(2):105-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0765.1998.tb02299.x.

Abstract

This study compared a rapid, colorimetric DNA probe assay designed to be performed in a dental office within 40 min, with anaerobic culture and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy (IFM) for detection of Bacteroides forsythus and Porphyromonas gingivalis in subgingival plaque samples. The DNA probe assay used the Periodontal Microbial Identification Test (Saigene Corporation, Bothell, Washington, USA). B. forsythus was detected in 46 (52%), 49 (55%) and 39 (44%) of the samples by DNA probe, culture (at levels > or = 10(5)) and IFM, respectively. P. gingivalis was detected in 24 (27%), 18 (20%) and 29 (33%) of the samples by DNA probe, culture (at levels > or = 10(5)) and IFM, respectively. Results from the DNA probe assay were compared to culture. Culture negative, probe positive samples were re-evaluated by IFM, and IFM positive samples were considered positive in "resolved" data. Using resolved data. DNA probe detection sensitivity and specificity values for B. forsythus were 81% and 91% and for P. gingivalis were 80% and 95%, respectively. DNA probe test results were further compared with culture and IFM. For samples negative by both culture and IFM, probe specificity was 92% in 25 B. forsythus samples and 95% in 57 P. gingivalis samples. For samples positive by both reference methods, probe sensitivity was 82% in 27 B. forsythus samples and 73% in 15 P. gingivalis samples. B. forsythus was detected more frequently by culture compared with IFM; the reverse was observed for P. gingivalis. The rapid DNA probe assay for B. forsythus and P. gingivalis was comparable to cultivable and IF analyses.

摘要

本研究比较了一种设计用于在牙科诊所40分钟内完成的快速比色DNA探针检测法,与厌氧培养及间接免疫荧光显微镜检查(IFM),用于检测龈下菌斑样本中的福赛坦氏菌和牙龈卟啉单胞菌。DNA探针检测法使用了牙周微生物鉴定试验(美国华盛顿州博塞尔市赛基因公司)。分别通过DNA探针、培养(水平≥10⁵)和IFM在46份(52%)、49份(55%)和39份(44%)样本中检测到福赛坦氏菌。分别通过DNA探针、培养(水平≥10⁵)和IFM在24份(27%)、18份(20%)和29份(33%)样本中检测到牙龈卟啉单胞菌。将DNA探针检测法的结果与培养结果进行比较。培养阴性、探针阳性的样本通过IFM重新评估,IFM阳性的样本在“解析”数据中被视为阳性。使用解析后的数据,福赛坦氏菌的DNA探针检测灵敏度和特异性值分别为81%和91%,牙龈卟啉单胞菌的分别为80%和95%。进一步将DNA探针检测结果与培养和IFM进行比较。对于培养和IFM均为阴性的样本,在25份福赛坦氏菌样本中探针特异性为92%,在57份牙龈卟啉单胞菌样本中为95%。对于两种参考方法均为阳性的样本,在27份福赛坦氏菌样本中探针灵敏度为82%,在15份牙龈卟啉单胞菌样本中为73%。与IFM相比,培养法更频繁地检测到福赛坦氏菌;而牙龈卟啉单胞菌的情况则相反。用于检测福赛坦氏菌和牙龈卟啉单胞菌的快速DNA探针检测法与可培养分析及IF分析相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验