Lyttle H A, Sidhu N, Smyth B
Department of Applied Oral Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Mar;79(3):342-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70248-3.
This study presented a survey to determine what general practitioners in Nova Scotia perceived to be the cause of noncarious cervical lesions, and to ascertain their most frequent method of treatment.
The survey was completed by 63% of the 343 dentists polled.
Ninety-four percent classified the lesion as abrasion, and 66% rated toothbrushing as the most likely cause. Treatment methods were varied, with no clear preference.
The most frequently used restorative materials were GI/composites (29%) and composites (27%). The results of the survey suggest that treatment provided for noncarious cervical lesions may not be based on the correct diagnosis.
本研究开展了一项调查,以确定新斯科舍省的全科医生认为非龋性颈部病变的病因是什么,并确定他们最常用的治疗方法。
在接受调查的343名牙医中,63%完成了调查问卷。
94%的人将病变归类为磨损,66%的人认为刷牙是最可能的病因。治疗方法多种多样,没有明显的偏好。
最常用的修复材料是玻璃离子/复合树脂(29%)和复合树脂(27%)。调查结果表明,针对非龋性颈部病变的治疗可能并非基于正确的诊断。