Oral & Maxillofacial Pathology, Radiology and Medicine, College of Dentistry, New York University, New York City, USA.
J Am Dent Assoc. 2013 May;144(5):495-506. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2013.0152.
The Practitioners Engaged in Applied Research and Learning (PEARL) Network conducted a three-armed randomized clinical study to determine the comparative effectiveness of three treatments for hypersensitive noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs): use of a potassium nitrate dentifrice for treatment of hypersensitivity, placement of a resin-based composite restoration and placement of a sealant.
Seventeen trained practitioner-investigators (P-Is) in the PEARL Network enrolled participants (N = 304) with hypersensitive posterior NCCLs who met enrollment criteria. Participants were assigned to treatments randomly. Evaluations were conducted at baseline and at one, three and six months thereafter. Primary outcomes were the reduction or elimination of hypersensitivity as measured clinically and by means of patient-reported outcomes.
Lesion depth and pretreatment sensitivity (mean, 5.3 on a 0- to 10-point scale) were balanced across treatments, as was sleep bruxism (present in 42.2 percent of participants). The six-month participant recall rate was 99 percent. Treatments significantly reduced mean sensitivity (P < .01), with the sealant and restoration groups displaying a significantly higher reduction (P < .01) than did the dentifrice group. The dentifrice group's mean (standard deviation) sensitivity at six months was 2.1 (2.1); those of the sealant and restoration groups were 1.0 (1.6) and 0.8 (1.4), respectively. Patient-reported sensitivity (to cold being most pronounced) paralleled clinical measurements at each evaluation.
Sealing and restoration treatments were effective overall in reducing NCCL hypersensitivity. The potassium nitrate dentifrice reduced sensitivity with increasing effectiveness through six months but not to the degree offered by the other treatments. Practical Implications. Sealant or restoration placement is an effective method of immediately reducing NCCL sensitivity. Although a potassium nitrate dentifrice did reduce sensitivity slowly across six months, at no time was the reduction commensurate with that of sealants or restorations.
从事应用研究和学习的从业者(PEARL)网络进行了一项三臂随机临床试验,以确定三种治疗方案治疗敏感非龋性颈(NCCL)的比较效果:使用硝酸钾牙膏治疗过敏,放置树脂基复合材料修复体和放置密封剂。
PEARL 网络的 17 名培训医师(P-Is)招募了符合纳入标准的敏感后 NCCL 患者(N = 304)。参与者被随机分配到治疗组。在基线和之后的一个、三个月和六个月进行评估。主要结局是临床和患者报告的结局评估的敏感性降低或消除。
病变深度和治疗前敏感性(平均值,0 至 10 分制上的 5.3)在治疗组之间平衡,磨牙症(42.2%的参与者存在)也是如此。六个月的参与者召回率为 99%。治疗方法显著降低了平均敏感性(P <.01),其中密封剂和修复组的降低幅度明显高于牙膏组(P <.01)。牙膏组在六个月时的平均(标准差)敏感性为 2.1(2.1);密封剂和修复组的敏感性分别为 1.0(1.6)和 0.8(1.4)。每个评估时患者报告的敏感性(以对冷的敏感性最明显)与临床测量结果一致。
总的来说,密封和修复治疗对减少 NCCL 敏感性有效。硝酸钾牙膏通过六个月的时间逐渐降低敏感性,但效果不如其他治疗方法。实际意义。放置密封剂或修复体是一种立即减少 NCCL 敏感性的有效方法。虽然硝酸钾牙膏在六个月内缓慢降低了敏感性,但在任何时候,其降低程度都与密封剂或修复体不相称。