Bell J A, Grant S J
Brain Imaging Section, Neuroscience Branch, Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 5500 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
Brain Res. 1998 Mar 30;788(1-2):237-44. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00003-1.
In vitro studies have not consistently demonstrated naloxone-precipitated opiate-withdrawal hyperactivity of locus coeruleus neurons. The reason for this inconsistency may be because partial or complete withdrawal occurred during preparation of the locus coeruleus slice. The aim of the present study was to assay opiate withdrawal-related hyperactivity in neurons recorded from locus coeruleus slices while ensuring the maintenance of dependence until naloxone-precipitated withdrawal. Extracellular recordings were obtained from individual locus coeruleus neurons in slices from morphine-treated and drug-naive rats. Morphine 1 microM was present in all solutions during preparation and recording in slices from morphine-treated rats. The average firing rate of the drug-naive controls was 0.93 Hz (+/-0.04 Hz). Bath application of morphine (1 microM) almost completely suppressed firing in drug-naive controls (0.058 Hz, +/-0.04 Hz, n=12), whereas in solutions containing 1 microM morphine, the firing rate of cells from morphine-treated rats averaged 0.71 Hz (+/-0.05 Hz), indicating considerable, but incomplete tolerance. In the same slices, naloxone increased the average spontaneous firing of locus coeruleus cells to 0.96 Hz (+/-0. 04 Hz). Thus, naloxone did not produce withdrawal hyperactivity, but returned the cells from morphine-treated rats to control rates. We conclude that locus coeruleus cells in locus coeruleus slice preparations from morphine-treated rats did not demonstrate withdrawal-related hyperactivity even when dependence was maintained until naloxone-precipitated withdrawal. Thus, our results do not support a role for adaptations intrinsic to locus coeruleus neurons in withdrawal hyperexcitability, but instead imply the necessity of functional afferent activity.
体外研究并未始终如一地证明纳洛酮诱发的蓝斑神经元阿片类药物戒断性多动。这种不一致的原因可能是在制备蓝斑切片的过程中发生了部分或完全戒断。本研究的目的是在确保维持依赖性直至纳洛酮诱发戒断的情况下,检测从蓝斑切片记录的神经元中与阿片类药物戒断相关的多动。从吗啡处理的大鼠和未用药物处理的大鼠的切片中单个蓝斑神经元进行细胞外记录。在吗啡处理的大鼠的切片制备和记录过程中,所有溶液中均存在1 microM的吗啡。未用药物处理的对照组的平均放电频率为0.93 Hz(±0.04 Hz)。浴用吗啡(1 microM)几乎完全抑制了未用药物处理的对照组的放电(0.058 Hz,±0.04 Hz,n = 12),而在含有1 microM吗啡的溶液中,吗啡处理的大鼠的细胞放电频率平均为0.71 Hz(±0.05 Hz),表明有相当程度但不完全的耐受性。在同一切片中,纳洛酮将蓝斑细胞的平均自发放电增加到0.96 Hz(±0.04 Hz)。因此,纳洛酮并未产生戒断性多动,而是使吗啡处理的大鼠的细胞放电频率恢复到对照水平。我们得出结论,即使在维持依赖性直至纳洛酮诱发戒断的情况下,吗啡处理的大鼠的蓝斑切片制备中的蓝斑细胞也未表现出与戒断相关的多动。因此,我们的结果不支持蓝斑神经元内在适应性在戒断性过度兴奋中的作用,而是暗示了功能性传入活动的必要性。