Buzzas G R, Kern S J, Smith R S, Harrison P B, Helmer S D, Reed J A
Department of Surgery, The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Wichita 67214, USA.
J Trauma. 1998 Apr;44(4):604-6; discussion 607-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199804000-00008.
It has been demonstrated that surgeons and surgery residents, trained in the focused abdominal sonographic examination, are able to accurately and reliably evaluate trauma patients. Despite this, radiologists have objected to surgeon-performed sonography for several reasons. We set out to compare the accuracy of sonographic examinations performed by surgery residents and radiologists.
A retrospective review of medical records of all trauma patients who received focused ultrasound examinations from January 1, 1995, through June 30, 1996, at one of two American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma centers in the same city was undertaken. Ultrasound examinations were performed by surgery residents at trauma center A (TCA) and by radiologists or radiology residents at trauma center B (TCB). Findings for each patient were compared with the results of computed tomography, diagnostic peritoneal lavage, operative exploration, or observation. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for each group of patients. Comparison of patient charges for the trauma ultrasound examinations at each of the trauma centers was also made.
Patient populations at the two centers were similar except that the mean Injury Severity Score at TCB was higher than at TCA (11.74 vs. 9.6). Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, or negative predictive value were not significantly different between the two cohorts. A significantly lower positive predictive value for examinations performed by surgery residents was noted and attributed to a lower threshold of the surgery residents to confirm their findings by computed tomography. Billing data revealed that the average charge for trauma sonography by radiologists (TCB) was $406.30. At TCA, trauma sonography did not generate a specific charge; however, a $20.00 sum was added to the trauma activation fee to cover ultrasound machine maintenance and supplies.
Focused ultrasound examination in the trauma suite can be as safely and accurately performed by surgery residents as by radiologists and radiology residents and should be a routine part of the initial trauma evaluation process.
已经证明,接受过聚焦腹部超声检查培训的外科医生和外科住院医师能够准确且可靠地评估创伤患者。尽管如此,放射科医生出于多种原因反对由外科医生进行超声检查。我们着手比较外科住院医师和放射科医生进行超声检查的准确性。
对1995年1月1日至1996年6月30日期间在同一城市的两家美国外科医师学会认证的一级创伤中心之一接受聚焦超声检查的所有创伤患者的病历进行回顾性研究。超声检查由创伤中心A(TCA)的外科住院医师以及创伤中心B(TCB)的放射科医生或放射科住院医师进行。将每位患者的检查结果与计算机断层扫描、诊断性腹腔灌洗、手术探查或观察结果进行比较。计算每组患者的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。还对每个创伤中心的创伤超声检查患者费用进行了比较。
两个中心的患者群体相似,只是TCB的平均损伤严重度评分高于TCA(分别为11.74和9.6)。两组之间的敏感性、特异性、准确性或阴性预测值没有显著差异。注意到外科住院医师进行检查的阳性预测值显著较低,这归因于外科住院医师通过计算机断层扫描确认其检查结果的阈值较低。计费数据显示,放射科医生(TCB)进行创伤超声检查的平均费用为406.30美元。在TCA,创伤超声检查没有产生特定费用;然而,在创伤激活费用中增加了20美元,以支付超声机器维护和耗材费用。
创伤病房中的聚焦超声检查由外科住院医师进行与由放射科医生和放射科住院医师进行一样安全准确,应成为初始创伤评估过程的常规组成部分。