Hudson D A, Krige J E, Grobbelaar A O, Morgan B, Grover R
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, South Africa.
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998 Mar;32(1):97-104. doi: 10.1080/02844319850158985.
Recent studies have shown that narrower excision margins may be safe, but the optimal or minimum margin for melanoma is unknown. Wide margins of excision are possible on the trunk and limbs, but functional and cosmetic constraints often limit the extent of excision on the face. A collaborative study from two continents (Cape Town, South Africa and Northwood, England) investigated the outcome of different excision margins of 106 patients with stage I melanoma of the face. The margin of excision was measured from the records of the pathological specimen. Thirty patients had margins of less than 1 cm, 64 had margins of between 1 and 2 cm, and 12 had margins greater than 2 cm. Primary apposition or flap closure was possible in 85 patients. Seven patients developed local recurrences and these were not influenced by the excision margin. This study supports the contention that the primary treatment of cutaneous melanoma on the face should be histologically confirmed complete excision, and that this can be achieved with margins of excision less than 1 cm. Local recurrence is not related to the margin of excision or to tumour thickness.
近期研究表明,较窄的切缘可能是安全的,但黑色素瘤的最佳或最小切缘尚不清楚。躯干和四肢可以进行广泛切除,但功能和美观方面的限制常常会限制面部的切除范围。一项来自两大洲(南非开普敦和英国诺斯伍德)的合作研究调查了106例面部I期黑色素瘤患者不同切除切缘的结果。切除切缘通过病理标本记录来测量。30例患者的切缘小于1厘米,64例患者的切缘在1至2厘米之间,12例患者的切缘大于2厘米。85例患者可行一期缝合或皮瓣闭合。7例患者出现局部复发,且这些复发不受切除切缘的影响。这项研究支持以下观点:面部皮肤黑色素瘤的主要治疗方法应为经组织学证实的完整切除,且切除切缘小于1厘米即可实现这一点。局部复发与切除切缘或肿瘤厚度无关。
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998-3
Dermatol Surg. 2016-3
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003-3
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009-10-7
Skin Health Dis. 2023-11-28
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021