文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

面部黑色素瘤:窄切缘的安全性

Melanoma of the face: the safety of narrow excision margins.

作者信息

Hudson D A, Krige J E, Grobbelaar A O, Morgan B, Grover R

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Cape Town, Groote Schuur Hospital, South Africa.

出版信息

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998 Mar;32(1):97-104. doi: 10.1080/02844319850158985.


DOI:10.1080/02844319850158985
PMID:9556824
Abstract

Recent studies have shown that narrower excision margins may be safe, but the optimal or minimum margin for melanoma is unknown. Wide margins of excision are possible on the trunk and limbs, but functional and cosmetic constraints often limit the extent of excision on the face. A collaborative study from two continents (Cape Town, South Africa and Northwood, England) investigated the outcome of different excision margins of 106 patients with stage I melanoma of the face. The margin of excision was measured from the records of the pathological specimen. Thirty patients had margins of less than 1 cm, 64 had margins of between 1 and 2 cm, and 12 had margins greater than 2 cm. Primary apposition or flap closure was possible in 85 patients. Seven patients developed local recurrences and these were not influenced by the excision margin. This study supports the contention that the primary treatment of cutaneous melanoma on the face should be histologically confirmed complete excision, and that this can be achieved with margins of excision less than 1 cm. Local recurrence is not related to the margin of excision or to tumour thickness.

摘要

近期研究表明,较窄的切缘可能是安全的,但黑色素瘤的最佳或最小切缘尚不清楚。躯干和四肢可以进行广泛切除,但功能和美观方面的限制常常会限制面部的切除范围。一项来自两大洲(南非开普敦和英国诺斯伍德)的合作研究调查了106例面部I期黑色素瘤患者不同切除切缘的结果。切除切缘通过病理标本记录来测量。30例患者的切缘小于1厘米,64例患者的切缘在1至2厘米之间,12例患者的切缘大于2厘米。85例患者可行一期缝合或皮瓣闭合。7例患者出现局部复发,且这些复发不受切除切缘的影响。这项研究支持以下观点:面部皮肤黑色素瘤的主要治疗方法应为经组织学证实的完整切除,且切除切缘小于1厘米即可实现这一点。局部复发与切除切缘或肿瘤厚度无关。

相似文献

[1]
Melanoma of the face: the safety of narrow excision margins.

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1998-3

[2]
Optimal excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Can J Surg. 2003-12

[3]
Minimum Safe Pathologic Excision Margins for Primary Cutaneous Melanomas (1-2 mm in Thickness): Analysis of 2131 Patients Treated at a Single Center.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2016-4

[4]
Efficacy of Staged Excision With Permanent Section Margin Control for Cutaneous Head and Neck Melanoma.

JAMA Dermatol. 2017-3-1

[5]
1 Versus 2-cm Excision Margins for pT2-pT4 Primary Cutaneous Melanoma (MelMarT): A Feasibility Study.

Ann Surg Oncol. 2018-5-30

[6]
Positive margins after surgical excision of locoregional cutaneous melanoma metastasis and their impact on patient outcome.

Eur J Dermatol. 2018-10-1

[7]
Excision Margins for Melanoma In Situ on the Head and Neck.

Dermatol Surg. 2016-3

[8]
Margins of excision for cutaneous melanoma of the eyelid skin: the Collaborative Eyelid Skin Melanoma Group Report.

Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003-3

[9]
Surgical excision margins for primary cutaneous melanoma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009-10-7

[10]
[Control of section margins without any gaps in paraffin sections of melanoma of the face].

Hautarzt. 2000-11

引用本文的文献

[1]
Comparison of large language models in management advice for melanoma: Google's AI BARD, BingAI and ChatGPT.

Skin Health Dis. 2023-11-28

[2]
Gene Identification and Potential Drug Therapy for Drug-Resistant Melanoma with Bioinformatics and Deep Learning Technology.

Dis Markers. 2022

[3]
Risk factors for positive sentinel lymph nodes in head and neck melanoma - a survival analysis.

Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索