Suppr超能文献

新型改良荧光偏振免疫分析法不会错误地提高终末期肾病患者的万古霉素浓度。

New modified fluorescence polarization immunoassay does not falsely elevate vancomycin concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease.

作者信息

Smith P F, Petros W P, Soucie M P, Copeland K R

机构信息

State University of New York at Buffalo, School of Pharmacy, USA.

出版信息

Ther Drug Monit. 1998 Apr;20(2):231-5. doi: 10.1097/00007691-199804000-00016.

Abstract

Recent literature has urged caution in the interpretation of vancomycin serum concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), because falsely elevated levels in excess of 70% have been reported with the most commonly used fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of a recently modified FPIA assay for use in patients with ESRD, in comparison to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and an enzyme-mediated immunoassay technique (EMIT). Serum vancomycin samples were prospectively collected from adults with ESRD undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Each sample was stored at -70 degrees C until analyzed in duplicate by FPIA, EMIT, and HPLC. In an in vitro experiment, blank serum samples with 15 microg/ml vancomycin were spiked with increasing amounts of CDP and analyzed in duplicate with the modified FPIA assay. When compared to HPLC, no statistically significant difference was found in patients with ESRD with the use of the modified FPIA assay (mean concentrations, HPLC 14.92 microg/ml, FPIA 15.96 microg/ml), with FPIA exhibiting a positive bias of 0.64 microg/ml and a precision of +/-3.49 microg/ml (n = 18, p = 0.44). The mean EMIT concentration was 18.34 microg/ml, with a positive bias of 3.43 microg/ml and a precision of +/-5.17 microg/ml (p < 0.01). The addition of increasing amounts of CDP to vancomycin in vitro resulted in concentrations similar to those expected in the absence of significant cross-reactivity with the modified FPIA assay. The modified FPIA assay is a satisfactory tool for monitoring vancomycin serum concentrations in patients with ESRD undergoing hemodialysis. Results obtained with EMIT were not as precise as with FPIA.

摘要

近期文献提示,在解读终末期肾病(ESRD)患者的万古霉素血清浓度时需谨慎,因为据报道,使用最常用的荧光偏振免疫分析法(FPIA)时,超过70%的结果会出现假性升高。本研究旨在评估一种最近改良的FPIA检测法在ESRD患者中的性能,并与高效液相色谱法(HPLC)和酶介导免疫分析技术(EMIT)进行比较。前瞻性收集接受慢性血液透析的成年ESRD患者的血清万古霉素样本。每个样本保存在-70℃,直至用FPIA、EMIT和HPLC进行双份检测。在一项体外实验中,向含15μg/ml万古霉素的空白血清样本中加入递增剂量的环糊精(CDP),并用改良FPIA检测法进行双份分析。与HPLC相比,在ESRD患者中使用改良FPIA检测法未发现统计学显著差异(平均浓度,HPLC为14.92μg/ml,FPIA为15.96μg/ml),FPIA显示正偏差为0.64μg/ml,精密度为±3.49μg/ml(n = 18,p = 0.44)。EMIT的平均浓度为18.34μg/ml,正偏差为3.43μg/ml,精密度为±5.17μg/ml(p < 0.01)。体外向万古霉素中加入递增剂量的CDP后,得到的浓度与在无显著交叉反应情况下改良FPIA检测法预期的浓度相似。改良FPIA检测法是监测接受血液透析的ESRD患者万古霉素血清浓度的一种令人满意的工具。EMIT获得的结果不如FPIA精确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验