Pitzalis M V, Mastropasqua F, Massari F, Forleo C, Passantino A, Colombo R, Totaro P, Rizzon P
Institute of Cardiology, University of Bari, Italy.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Mar;21(3):559-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00099.x.
To evaluate the effect of a hydrophilic and a lipophilic beta-blocker on the autonomic nervous system, 20 normal subjects were studied under baseline conditions and 7 days after being randomly assigned to metoprolol (200 mg/day), nadolol (80 mg/day), and placebo. Under each condition, the time-domain parameters were analyzed by means of 24-hour ECG monitoring and the frequency-domain parameters by means of the autoregressive method using 10-minute ECGs during rest, controlled respiration, and after a head-up tilt test. The alpha index (the gain in the relationship between the RR period and systolic arterial pressure variability) was also calculated. Both nadolol and metoprolol significantly increased all of the time-domain parameters except the standard deviation of the RH intervals; they also modified the frequency-domain parameters. Both blunted the significant reduction in the high frequency (HF) component and alpha index during tilt. In normal subjects, hydrophilic and lipophilic beta-blockers similarly modify the time- and frequency-domain parameters that are particularly evident when high sympathetic tone is present (during daytime and tilt). The value of the alpha index was increased by both beta-blockers in the HF, but not in the low frequency band; this difference might be due to the fact that the former is a measure of the vagal component of the baroreflex control and the latter a measure of the sympathetic component. The effects of hydrophilic and lipophilic beta-blockers on the time- and frequency-domain parameters of heart rate variability are similar.
为评估亲水性和亲脂性β受体阻滞剂对自主神经系统的影响,对20名正常受试者在基线条件下以及随机分配至美托洛尔(200毫克/天)、纳多洛尔(80毫克/天)和安慰剂组7天后进行了研究。在每种条件下,通过24小时心电图监测分析时域参数,通过自回归方法利用静息、控制呼吸及头高位倾斜试验期间的10分钟心电图分析频域参数。还计算了α指数(RR间期与收缩期动脉压变异性之间关系的增益)。纳多洛尔和美托洛尔均显著增加了除RR间期标准差之外的所有时域参数;它们还改变了频域参数。两者均减弱了倾斜期间高频(HF)成分和α指数的显著降低。在正常受试者中,亲水性和亲脂性β受体阻滞剂同样改变时域和频域参数,在高交感神经张力存在时(白天和倾斜期间)尤为明显。两种β受体阻滞剂均使HF中的α指数增加,但低频带未增加;这种差异可能是由于前者是压力反射控制的迷走神经成分的一种测量指标,而后者是交感神经成分的一种测量指标。亲水性和亲脂性β受体阻滞剂对心率变异性时域和频域参数的影响相似。