Suppr超能文献

一个社区组织的干预措施对市中心区疫苗接种覆盖率的影响:佐治亚州富尔顿县,1992 - 1993年

The impact of interventions by a community-based organization on inner-city vaccination coverage: Fulton County, Georgia, 1992-1993.

作者信息

LeBaron C W, Starnes D, Dini E F, Chambliss J W, Chaney M

机构信息

National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1998 Apr;152(4):327-32. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.152.4.327.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of interventions by a community-based organization on immunization rates.

DESIGN

Controlled community intervention trial.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Children aged 3 to 59 months in Fulton County, Georgia, who were patients of 1 of 4 public clinics (clinic based), or residents of 1 of 9 inner-city communities (residence based).

INTERVENTIONS

(1) Clinic-based intervention included monthly review of clinic vaccination records to identify undervaccinated children followed by contact with family (reminder-recall strategy); (2) residence-based intervention included door-to-door assessment and education campaigns followed by mobile van vaccinations, temporary on-site vaccination stations, free child care and transportation to providers, incentives of food and baby products, focus groups, and coalitions with local organizations (community saturation with vaccination messages and opportunities).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in vaccination rates after 1 year based on clinic record reviews and population surveys.

RESULTS

For clinic-based intervention, series completion rates improved from 43% (87/204) to 58% (99/170) in intervention clinics (P=.003), while rates in control clinics did not change from the baseline of 52% (81/157 to 78/150), for a net difference between intervention and control arms of +15 percentage points (P=.046). For residence-based intervention, age-appropriate vaccination rates improved from 44% (154/347) to 61% (260/429) in intervention communities (+17 percentage points; P<.001) compared with improvement of 44% (78/178) to 58% (129/221) for control communities (+14 percentage points; P=.004), but the difference between arms was not significant (+3 percentage points, P=.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Reminder-recall activities by the community-based organization improved vaccination rates in intervention clinics compared with control clinics. A statistically significant impact on vaccination rates could not be detected for residence-based interventions by the community-based organization.

摘要

目的

评估一个社区组织的干预措施对免疫接种率的影响。

设计

社区对照干预试验。

地点与参与者

佐治亚州富尔顿县3至59个月大的儿童,他们是4家公立诊所(以诊所为基础)中1家的患者,或9个市中心社区(以居住地为基础)中1个社区的居民。

干预措施

(1)以诊所为基础的干预措施包括每月审查诊所的疫苗接种记录,以识别接种不足的儿童,随后与家庭联系(提醒-召回策略);(2)以居住地为基础的干预措施包括挨家挨户的评估和教育活动,随后开展流动疫苗接种车接种、临时现场接种站、免费儿童护理以及提供前往医疗机构的交通服务、食品和婴儿产品奖励、焦点小组讨论以及与当地组织建立联盟(通过疫苗接种信息和机会实现社区全覆盖)。

观察指标

基于诊所记录审查和人口调查得出的1年后疫苗接种率的变化。

结果

对于以诊所为基础的干预措施,干预诊所的系列疫苗接种完成率从43%(87/204)提高到了58%(99/170)(P = 0.003),而对照诊所的接种率从基线的52%(81/157至78/150)未发生变化,干预组与对照组之间的净差异为+15个百分点(P = 0.046)。对于以居住地为基础的干预措施,干预社区中适龄疫苗接种率从44%(154/347)提高到了61%(260/429)(+17个百分点;P<0.001),而对照社区从44%(78/178)提高到了58%(129/221)(+14个百分点;P = 0.004),但两组之间的差异不显著(+3个百分点,P = 0.78)。

结论

与对照诊所相比,该社区组织开展的提醒-召回活动提高了干预诊所的疫苗接种率。该社区组织以居住地为基础的干预措施对疫苗接种率未检测到具有统计学意义的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验