Löscher W
Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Pharmacy, School of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Germany.
Prog Neurobiol. 1998 Apr;54(6):721-41. doi: 10.1016/s0301-0082(97)00092-0.
It is widely accepted that excitatory amino acid transmitters such as glutamate are involved in the initiation of seizures and their propagation. Most attention has been directed to synapses using NMDA receptors, but more recent evidence indicates potential roles for ionotropic non-NMDA (AMPA/kainate) and metabotropic glutamate receptors as well. Based on the role of glutamate in the development and expression of seizures, antagonism of glutamate receptors has long been thought to provide a rational strategy in the search for new, effective anticonvulsant drugs. Furthermore, because glutamate receptor antagonists, particularly those acting on NMDA receptors, protect effectively in the induction of kindling, it was suggested that they may have utility in epilepsy prophylaxis, for example, after head trauma. However, first clinical trials with competitive and uncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonists in patients with partial (focal) seizures, showed that these drugs lack convincing anticonvulsant activity but induce severe neurotoxic adverse effects in doses which were well tolerated in healthy volunteers. Interestingly, the only animal model which predicted the unfavorable clinical activity of competitive NMDA antagonists in patients with chronic epilepsy was the kindling model of temporal lobe epilepsy, indicating that this model should be used in the search for more effective and less toxic glutamate receptor antagonists. In this review, results from a large series of experiments on different categories of glutamate receptor antagonists in fully kindled rats are summarized and discussed. NMDA antagonists, irrespective whether they are competitive, high- or low-affinity uncompetitive, glycine site or polyamine site antagonists, do not counteract focal seizure activity and only weakly, if at all, attenuate propagation to secondarily generalized seizures in this model, indicating that once kindling is established, NMDA receptors are not critical for the expression of fully kindled seizures. In contrast, ionotropic non-NMDA receptor antagonists exert potent anticonvulsant effects on both initiation and propagation of kindled seizures. This effect can be markedly potentiated by combination with low doses of NMDA antagonists, suggesting that an optimal treatment of focal and secondarily generalized seizures may require combined use of both non-NMDA and NMDA antagonists. Given the promising results obtained with novel AMPA/kainate antagonists and glycine/NMDA partial agonists in the kindling model, the hope for soon having potentially useful glutamate antagonists for use in epileptic patients is increasing.
人们普遍认为,兴奋性氨基酸递质如谷氨酸参与癫痫发作的起始及其传播。大多数注意力都集中在使用NMDA受体的突触上,但最近的证据表明离子型非NMDA(AMPA/海人酸)和代谢型谷氨酸受体也具有潜在作用。基于谷氨酸在癫痫发作的发生和表达中的作用,长期以来人们一直认为拮抗谷氨酸受体是寻找新型有效抗惊厥药物的合理策略。此外,由于谷氨酸受体拮抗剂,特别是那些作用于NMDA受体的拮抗剂,在点燃诱导中具有有效的保护作用,因此有人提出它们可能在癫痫预防中有用,例如在头部创伤后。然而,在部分(局灶性)癫痫患者中使用竞争性和非竞争性NMDA受体拮抗剂的首次临床试验表明,这些药物缺乏令人信服的抗惊厥活性,但在健康志愿者能良好耐受的剂量下会诱发严重的神经毒性不良反应。有趣的是,唯一能预测竞争性NMDA拮抗剂对慢性癫痫患者临床不良活性的动物模型是颞叶癫痫的点燃模型,这表明该模型应被用于寻找更有效且毒性更小的谷氨酸受体拮抗剂。在这篇综述中,总结并讨论了在完全点燃的大鼠中对不同类别谷氨酸受体拮抗剂进行的大量实验结果。NMDA拮抗剂,无论它们是竞争性、高亲和力或低亲和力非竞争性、甘氨酸位点或多胺位点拮抗剂,在该模型中都不能抵消局灶性癫痫发作活动,并且对继发性全身性癫痫发作的传播仅有微弱的(如果有的话)减弱作用,这表明一旦点燃建立,NMDA受体对于完全点燃的癫痫发作的表达并不关键。相比之下,离子型非NMDA受体拮抗剂对点燃癫痫发作的起始和传播均具有强大的抗惊厥作用。与低剂量的NMDA拮抗剂联合使用可显著增强这种作用,这表明对局灶性和继发性全身性癫痫发作的最佳治疗可能需要联合使用非NMDA和NMDA拮抗剂。鉴于新型AMPA/海人酸拮抗剂和甘氨酸/NMDA部分激动剂在点燃模型中取得了有前景的结果,人们越来越希望很快能有潜在有用的谷氨酸拮抗剂用于癫痫患者。