Chiou W L, Chung S M, Robbie G
Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacodynamics (M/C 865) College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago 60612, USA.
J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1997 Aug;25(4):471-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1025745009925.
A recent study by Heatherington and Rowland showing discrepancies in steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) estimation of two barbiturates between bolus and infusion studies in rat hindlimb preparations was reviewed. Their rationale is that increasing the duration of administration may increase the accessibility for tissue distribution and thus increase Vss for compounds showing slow tissue uptake. Such a dosing-duration-dependent distribution concept is, however, inconsistent with the principle in linear kinetics that the fate or disposition function of any drug molecules is independent of time of administration and presence of other molecules. When their well-designed bolus studies were reanalyzed by including extrapolated outflow data from the last sampling time to infinity, the Vss values for the two barbiturates were found to be very similar to those obtained by the infusion method. Our analysis seems to validate a theoretical concept that parameter estimation is independent of the duration of administration in linear kinetics. A potential complication of using the bolus method to study Vss is presented.
希瑟林顿和罗兰最近的一项研究回顾了大鼠后肢制剂中两种巴比妥类药物在推注和输注研究之间稳态分布容积(Vss)估计值的差异。他们的理由是,增加给药持续时间可能会增加组织分布的可及性,从而增加组织摄取缓慢的化合物的Vss。然而,这种给药持续时间依赖性分布概念与线性动力学原理不一致,即任何药物分子的命运或处置功能与给药时间和其他分子的存在无关。当通过纳入从最后采样时间到无穷大的外推流出数据重新分析他们精心设计的推注研究时,发现两种巴比妥类药物的Vss值与通过输注法获得的值非常相似。我们的分析似乎验证了一个理论概念,即在线性动力学中参数估计与给药持续时间无关。本文还介绍了使用推注法研究Vss的一个潜在并发症。