Altwein J E
Urologische Abteilung, Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder, München-Nymphenburg.
Urologe A. 1998 Mar;37(2):149-52. doi: 10.1007/s001200050163.
In a comparative analysis of 29 studies, maximal androgen deprivation (MAD) was not found to be superior to partial androgen deprivation. Thus, MAD cannot be regarded as the new gold standard. Most trials focus on quality of life which--given the palliative aim of the treatment--deserves special attention. This aspect has not yet been evaluated, however, in the largest multicenter study, intergroup study 0105. In patients with advanced bone metastasis or severe pain, MAD treatment should be begun because of the flare phenomenon. The synergistic effects of LHRH agonists on the prostate are currently being investigated. Since no clear prognostic factors exist and reduction of serum-PSA levels under MAD does not delay progression, the patient must help to make the decision of whether or not MAD should be begun.
在对29项研究的比较分析中,未发现最大雄激素剥夺(MAD)优于部分雄激素剥夺。因此,MAD不能被视为新的金标准。鉴于治疗的姑息性目的,大多数试验关注生活质量,这值得特别关注。然而,在最大的多中心研究——组间研究0105中,这一方面尚未得到评估。对于有晚期骨转移或严重疼痛的患者,由于flare现象,应开始MAD治疗。目前正在研究促性腺激素释放激素(LHRH)激动剂对前列腺的协同作用。由于不存在明确的预后因素,且MAD治疗下血清前列腺特异抗原(PSA)水平的降低并不会延迟疾病进展,因此必须由患者来决定是否应开始MAD治疗。