• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用液晶柱通过气相色谱法分离燕麦敌和氟乐灵。

Separation of benefin and trifluralin by gas chromatography using a liquid crystal column.

作者信息

Hall M, Mallen D N

出版信息

J Chromatogr Sci. 1976 Sep;14(9):451-2. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/14.9.451.

DOI:10.1093/chromsci/14.9.451
PMID:956328
Abstract

Benefin (N-[n-butyl]-N-ethyl-2,6-dinitro-alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluoro-p-toluidine) and trifluralin (2,6-dinitro-N,N-di-n-propyl-alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluoro-p-toluidine) (Figure 1) are isomeric preemergent herbicides (1,2). As they possess different activities, their use necessitates the development of a routine analytical method which differentiates between them. The separation of these isomers by gas-liquid chromatography (GLC) using conventional column packings has proved extremely difficult. Two partly successful separations have been previously reported to date. A partial separation was obtained using a Durapak-Carbowax 400/Poracil C column (3) and a complete separation using a column packed with a monomolecular layer of Carbowax 20M on Chromosorb W (4). Unfortunately, this latter column has a very limited life and the analysis time is 25 minutes. This paper reports a rapid and reproducible separation of benefin and trifluralin using a liquid crystal stationary phase.

摘要

乙丁氟灵(N-(正丁基)-N-乙基-2,6-二硝基-α,α,α-三氟对甲苯胺)和氟乐灵(2,6-二硝基-N,N-二正丙基-α,α,α-三氟对甲苯胺)(图1)是同分异构的芽前除草剂(1,2)。由于它们具有不同的活性,因此在使用时需要开发一种能够区分它们的常规分析方法。使用传统柱填料通过气液色谱法(GLC)分离这些异构体已证明极其困难。迄今为止,此前已有两篇部分成功分离的报道。使用Durapak-聚乙二醇400/硅胶C柱实现了部分分离(3),使用在Chromosorb W上填充有单分子层聚乙二醇20M的柱实现了完全分离(4)。不幸的是,后一种柱的使用寿命非常有限,且分析时间为25分钟。本文报道了使用液晶固定相对乙丁氟灵和氟乐灵进行快速且可重复的分离。

相似文献

1
Separation of benefin and trifluralin by gas chromatography using a liquid crystal column.使用液晶柱通过气相色谱法分离燕麦敌和氟乐灵。
J Chromatogr Sci. 1976 Sep;14(9):451-2. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/14.9.451.
2
Determination of benefin and trifluralin residues by quantitative gas-liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry.采用气相色谱/质谱联用法定量测定燕麦灵和氟乐灵残留量。
J Agric Food Chem. 1976 Nov-Dec;24(6):1223-5. doi: 10.1021/jf60208a011.
3
Separation of benefin and trifluralin by gas chromatography.气相色谱法分离甜菜安和氟乐灵
J Chromatogr Sci. 1972 Mar;10(3):176-80. doi: 10.1093/chromsci/10.3.176.
4
Gas chromatographic determination of residue levels of the herbicides trifluralin, benefin, ethalfluralin, and isopropalin in soil with confirmation by mass selective detection.气相色谱法测定土壤中除草剂氟乐灵、乙丁烯氟灵、安磺灵和异乐灵的残留量,并通过质量选择性检测进行确证
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1988 Nov-Dec;71(6):1082-5.
5
Gas chromatographic determination of N-butyl-N-ethyl-alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-p-toluidine and alpha, alpha, alpha-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine in formulation.气相色谱法测定制剂中N-丁基-N-乙基-α,α,α-三氟-2,6-二硝基对甲苯胺和α,α,α-三氟-2,6-二硝基-N,N-二丙基对甲苯胺
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1971 May;54(3):711-2.
6
Comparison of the persistence of ethalfluralin and trifluralin in Saskatchewan field soils.乙丁烯氟灵和氟乐灵在萨斯喀彻温省田间土壤中的持久性比较。
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1980 Sep;25(3):508-11. doi: 10.1007/BF01985563.
7
Determination of N-nitrosodipropylamine in trifluralin emulsifiable concentrates using minicolumn cleanup and gas chromatography with thermal energy analyzer.
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1988 Mar-Apr;71(2):333-6.
8
Separation and identification of trifluralin metabolites by open-tubular liquid chromatography/negative chemical ionization mass spectrometry.采用开管液相色谱/负化学电离质谱法分离和鉴定氟乐灵代谢物。
Biomed Environ Mass Spectrom. 1988 Jul;17(1):47-53. doi: 10.1002/bms.1200170110.
9
Degradation of Trifluralin, Oryzalin, and Isopropalin in soil.氟乐灵、安磺灵和异丙乐灵在土壤中的降解
Environ Qual Saf Suppl. 1975;3:258-61.
10
Aerobic and anaerobic degradation of profluralin and trifluralin.氟乐灵和三氟拉林的需氧和厌氧降解
J Environ Sci Health B. 1980;15(5):457-73. doi: 10.1080/03601238009372196.