• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科临床审计活动

Clinical audit activities in surgery.

作者信息

Dale R F

机构信息

Surgical Epidemiology and Audit Unit, Royal College of Surgeons, London, UK.

出版信息

J Qual Clin Pract. 1998 Mar;18(1):47-54.

PMID:9563561
Abstract

Large scale audits can attract the participation of the majority of surgeons. They require careful planning and must be supported by an infrastructure to co-ordinate the running of the audit and to ensure accuracy of data. Audits can be important sources of information for the development of evidence-based guidelines, and this approach is a good strategy for bringing the lessons obtained from the audit to the profession. Audits that work closely with professional bodies produce the best results and are enhanced by patient representation. Risk stratification is an essential component of comparative studies and should be incorporated to ensure that multi-centre audits are systematic.

摘要

大规模审计能够吸引大多数外科医生参与。它们需要精心规划,并且必须有一个基础设施来支持,以协调审计工作的开展并确保数据的准确性。审计可以成为制定循证指南的重要信息来源,而且这种方法是将审计中获得的经验教训传达给整个行业的良好策略。与专业机构密切合作的审计能产生最佳效果,并且有患者代表参与会得到加强。风险分层是比较研究的重要组成部分,应予以纳入以确保多中心审计的系统性。

相似文献

1
Clinical audit activities in surgery.外科临床审计活动
J Qual Clin Pract. 1998 Mar;18(1):47-54.
2
Guidelines for surgical audit in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰外科审计指南。
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jan-Feb;76(1-2):78-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03639.x.
3
Clinical audit at the heart of clinical effectiveness.临床审计是临床疗效的核心。
J Qual Clin Pract. 1998 Mar;18(1):3-19.
4
Clinical effectiveness for health care quality improvement.用于改善医疗保健质量的临床效果。
J Qual Clin Pract. 1998 Mar;18(1):37-46.
5
Surgical audit: are we not closing the loop?
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Oct 8;31(8):966-972. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-06-2017-0109.
6
Medical audit in Britain: what now and what next?英国的医疗审计:现状与未来?
Qual Assur Health Care. 1989;1(1):61-3. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/1.1.61.
7
MAAGs (Medical Audit Advisory Groups): the Eli Lilly National Clinical Audit Centre.
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1993;6(3):4-8. doi: 10.1108/09526869310038415.
8
A strategic approach to implementing clinical governance.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999 Sep;81(5 Suppl):248-50.
9
Clinical audits: why and for whom.
ANZ J Surg. 2007 Jul;77(7):572-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2007.04140.x.
10
Clinical audit, the case for ethical scrutiny?
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 1996;9(6):18-20. doi: 10.1108/09526869610128223.