• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于术后镇痛以防止意外移位的硬膜外导管皮下隧道置入术:一项随机对照试验。

Subcutaneous tunnelling of epidural catheters for postoperative analgesia to prevent accidental dislodgement: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Burstal R, Wegener F, Hayes C, Lantry G

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, N.S.W.

出版信息

Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998 Apr;26(2):147-51. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9802600203.

DOI:10.1177/0310057X9802600203
PMID:9564391
Abstract

The use of subcutaneous tunnelling to prevent movement of epidural catheters was examined in a prospective controlled trial. There were 113 patients in the standard group and 100 in the tunnelled group. The groups were similar with respect to age, sex and weight. There were 176 thoracic catheters, and 37 lumbar catheters. Mean duration of catheterization in the tunnelled group was 3.5 +/- 1.3 days and in the standard group, 3.1 +/- 1.5 days. In total, 60 catheters moved significantly from their initial position: 17 (28%) moved inwards and 43 (72%) moved outwards. 159 catheters were still functioning at the time of their removal, 76 standard and 83 tunnelled. This represents 67 and 83% of the two groups respectively. Subcutaneous tunnelling was shown to prevent clinically significant inwards (P = 0.043) and outwards (P = 0.0005) movement of epidural catheters and is more likely to result in a functional epidural blockade at the time of catheter removal (P = 0.0084).

摘要

在一项前瞻性对照试验中,研究了采用皮下隧道技术防止硬膜外导管移位的情况。标准组有113例患者,隧道组有100例患者。两组在年龄、性别和体重方面相似。共有176根胸段导管和37根腰段导管。隧道组的平均置管时间为3.5±1.3天,标准组为3.1±1.5天。总共有60根导管从其初始位置发生了明显移位:17根(28%)向内移位,43根(72%)向外移位。159根导管在拔除时仍在发挥作用,标准组76根,隧道组83根。这分别占两组的67%和83%。结果显示,皮下隧道技术可防止硬膜外导管发生具有临床意义的向内(P = 0.043)和向外(P = 0.0005)移位,并且在拔除导管时更有可能形成有效的硬膜外阻滞(P = 0.0084)。

相似文献

1
Subcutaneous tunnelling of epidural catheters for postoperative analgesia to prevent accidental dislodgement: a randomized controlled trial.用于术后镇痛以防止意外移位的硬膜外导管皮下隧道置入术:一项随机对照试验。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998 Apr;26(2):147-51. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9802600203.
2
Epidural catheter fixation: subcutaneous tunnelling with a loop to prevent displacement.
Anaesthesia. 2000 Nov;55(11):1113-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2000.01547-2.x.
3
The effect of tunnelling on epidural catheter migration.隧道式置管对硬膜外导管移位的影响。
Anaesthesia. 1996 Feb;51(2):191-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1996.tb07714.x.
4
Epidural catheter migration: a comparison of tunnelling against a new technique of catheter fixation.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003 Oct;31(5):518-22. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0303100505.
5
Tunnelling of thoracic epidural catheters is associated with fewer catheter-related infections: a retrospective registry analysis.经皮胸椎硬膜外导管隧道技术与较少的导管相关感染相关:一项回顾性登记分析。
Br J Anaesth. 2016 Apr;116(4):546-53. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew026.
6
Epidural analgesia: prospective audit of 1062 patients.硬膜外镇痛:对1062例患者的前瞻性审计
Anaesth Intensive Care. 1998 Apr;26(2):165-72. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9802600206.
7
[Peridural catheter for postoperative long-term analgesia in children].[小儿术后长期镇痛的硬膜外导管]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 1996 Aug;31(6):362-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995936.
8
Multimodal analgesia using intrathecal diamorphine, and paravertebral and rectus sheath catheters are as effective as thoracic epidural for analgesia post-open two-phase esophagectomy within an enhanced recovery program.在强化康复计划中,使用鞘内注射二氢吗啡酮、椎旁和腹直肌鞘导管的多模式镇痛与胸段硬膜外镇痛在开放性两阶段食管切除术后的镇痛效果相同。
Dis Esophagus. 2018 Jun 1;31(6). doi: 10.1093/dote/doy006.
9
An analysis of postoperative epidural analgesia failure by computed tomography epidurography.通过计算机断层扫描硬膜外造影术分析术后硬膜外镇痛失败情况。
Anesth Analg. 2006 Oct;103(4):1026-32. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000237291.30499.32.
10
Impact of Epidural Failures on the Results of a Prospective, Randomized Trial.硬膜外麻醉失败对一项前瞻性随机试验结果的影响。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Apr;26(2):160-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1396414. Epub 2015 Feb 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention of Epidural Catheter Migration and Inflammation by Tunneling: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.通过隧道技术预防硬膜外导管移位和炎症:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 15;14(16):5788. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165788.
2
Epidural catheter migration in non-obstetric adult surgical patients: A prospective, observational, cohort study.非产科成年外科手术患者硬膜外导管移位:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Jun;67(6):509-514. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_830_22. Epub 2023 Jun 14.
3
Prevention of epidural catheter migration: a comparative evaluation of two tunneling techniques.
预防硬膜外导管迁移:两种隧道技术的比较评估。
Korean J Anesthesiol. 2021 Feb;74(1):59-64. doi: 10.4097/kja.20131. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
4
Acute cerebral infarction in a patient with an epidural catheter after left upper lobectomy: a case report.左肺上叶切除术后硬膜外导管留置患者并发急性脑梗死:病例报告。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Feb 23;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0695-9.
5
Tunneling Does Not Prevent Dislodgment of Epidural Catheters: A Randomized Trial.隧道技术不能防止硬膜外导管移位:一项随机试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Oct-Dec;12(4):930-936. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_159_18.
6
Epidural catheter fixation. A comparison of subcutaneous tunneling versus device fixation technique.硬膜外导管固定:皮下隧道法与器械固定技术的比较
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jan-Mar;32(1):65-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.175667.
7
Tunneling and suture of thoracic epidural catheters decrease the incidence of catheter dislodgement.胸段硬膜外导管的隧道式置入和缝合可降低导管移位的发生率。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:610635. doi: 10.1155/2014/610635. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
8
Efficacy of multimodal pain control protocol in the setting of total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中多模式疼痛控制方案的疗效。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2009 Sep;1(3):155-60. doi: 10.4055/cios.2009.1.3.155. Epub 2009 Aug 17.