Orchik D J, Ge N N, Shea J J
Shea Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee 38119, USA.
J Am Acad Audiol. 1998 Apr;9(2):121-6.
Transtympanic electrocochleography using rarefaction and condensation clicks was performed on 122 ears of 112 patients, including 98 ears of 89 patients with Menière's disease (MD) and 24 ears of 23 patients without Menière's disease (NMD). The mean action potential (AP) latency difference between rarefaction and condensation clicks was 0.40 +/- 0.37 msec in the MD group and 0.06 +/- 0.07 msec in the NMD group (p < .01). An AP latency shift > 0.2 msec was found more often in the MD group (62.2% vs 8.3%) and in ears with an enlarged summating potential and AP ratio (69.7% vs 36.4%). The results suggest that comparison of rarefaction and condensation latencies may serve as a useful addition to electrocochleography in the diagnosis of MD.
对112例患者的122只耳朵进行了使用疏波和密波短声的经鼓膜电耳蜗图检查,其中包括89例梅尼埃病(MD)患者的98只耳朵和23例非梅尼埃病(NMD)患者的24只耳朵。MD组中疏波和密波短声之间的平均动作电位(AP)潜伏期差异为0.40±0.37毫秒,NMD组为0.06±0.07毫秒(p<0.01)。MD组(62.2%对8.3%)以及总和电位和AP比值增大的耳朵(69.7%对36.4%)中,AP潜伏期偏移>0.2毫秒的情况更常见。结果表明,疏波和密波潜伏期的比较可能是电耳蜗图在MD诊断中的一项有用补充。