• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重复率、相位和频率对新生儿及成人听觉脑干反应的影响。

Effects of repetition rate, phase, and frequency on the auditory brainstem response in neonates and adults.

作者信息

Parthasarathy T K, Borgsmiller P, Cohlan B

机构信息

Department of Special Education and Communication Disorders, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville 62026-1776, USA.

出版信息

J Am Acad Audiol. 1998 Apr;9(2):134-40.

PMID:9564676
Abstract

This study evaluated the effects of stimulus repetition rate, phase, and frequency on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) in normal-hearing neonates and adults. In both neonates and adults, the results clearly showed large ABR wave V latency differences between condensation and rarefaction for low-frequency stimuli. Phase dependent latency effects are believed to be a result of the phase-sensitive low-frequency neurons. Increasing stimulus repetition rate produced greater wave V latency shift in neonates than in adults. The consequences of rate changes were independent of stimulus phase and frequency.

摘要

本研究评估了刺激重复率、相位和频率对听力正常的新生儿和成人听觉脑干反应(ABR)的影响。在新生儿和成人中,结果均清楚显示,对于低频刺激,密波和疏波之间的ABR波V潜伏期存在显著差异。相位依赖性潜伏期效应被认为是相位敏感的低频神经元的结果。与成人相比,增加刺激重复率在新生儿中产生的波V潜伏期偏移更大。重复率变化的结果与刺激相位和频率无关。

相似文献

1
Effects of repetition rate, phase, and frequency on the auditory brainstem response in neonates and adults.重复率、相位和频率对新生儿及成人听觉脑干反应的影响。
J Am Acad Audiol. 1998 Apr;9(2):134-40.
2
Auditory brainstem responses to level-specific chirps in normal-hearing adults.听力正常成年人对特定强度啁啾声的听觉脑干反应。
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Oct;23(9):712-21. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.23.9.5.
3
Click-evoked ABR at high stimulus repetition rates for neonatal hearing screening.用于新生儿听力筛查的高刺激重复率下的点击诱发听性脑干反应
Int J Audiol. 2003 Mar;42(2):59-70. doi: 10.3109/14992020309078337.
4
Neonate Auditory Brainstem Responses to CE-Chirp and CE-Chirp Octave Band Stimuli II: Versus Adult Auditory Brainstem Responses.新生儿对CE-线性调频脉冲和CE-线性调频脉冲倍频程带刺激的听觉脑干反应II:与成人听觉脑干反应的对比
Ear Hear. 2016 Nov/Dec;37(6):724-743. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000344.
5
Brainstem auditory evoked potentials with speech stimulus in neonates.脑干听觉诱发电位与新生儿的言语刺激。
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Mar-Apr;86(2):191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.11.006. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
6
Auditory Brainstem Response Thresholds to Air- and Bone-Conducted CE-Chirps in Neonates and Adults.新生儿和成人对气导和骨导CE-啁啾声的听觉脑干反应阈值
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2016 Aug 1;59(4):853-9. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0182.
7
Effects of stimulus phase on the normal auditory brainstem response.
J Speech Hear Res. 1992 Feb;35(1):167-74. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3501.167.
8
Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.使用交错反应之间的时域互相关分析点击诱发的听觉脑干反应。
Ear Hear. 2014 May-Jun;35(3):318-29. doi: 10.1097/01.aud.0000441035.40169.f2.
9
Auditory brainstem response thresholds to air and bone conducted clicks in neonates and adults.新生儿和成人对气导和骨导短声的听觉脑干反应阈值。
Am J Otol. 1993 Mar;14(2):176-82.
10
Evaluation of waveform, latency and amplitude values of chirp ABR in newborns.新生儿啁啾听性脑干反应的波形、潜伏期和波幅值评估。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Apr;78(4):631-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.01.020. Epub 2014 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Stimulus Polarity on the Auditory Brainstem Response From Level-Specific Chirp.刺激极性对特定强度线性调频声诱发的听觉脑干反应的影响
J Audiol Otol. 2021 Oct;25(4):199-208. doi: 10.7874/jao.2021.00248. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
2
The Effects of Stimulus Rate on ABR Morphology and its Relationship to P1 CAEP Responses and Auditory Speech Perception Outcomes in Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: Evidence from Case Reports.刺激速率对听神经病谱系障碍儿童ABR形态的影响及其与P1 CAEP反应和听觉言语感知结果的关系:病例报告证据
Hearing Balance Commun. 2018;16(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/21695717.2017.1418803. Epub 2017 Dec 22.