Suppr超能文献

Allograft heart valve viability and valve-processing variables.

作者信息

Gall K L, Smith S E, Willmette C A, O'Brien M F

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Apr;65(4):1032-8. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00085-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The impact of allograft valve viability on valve durability remains controversial. Analyses of our clinical results have demonstrated the superiority of the cryopreserved valve viable at the time of implantation over the 4 degrees C stored valve nonviable at the time of implantation. In this study, we quantitatively assessed the effects on viability of current and past valve-processing protocols at The Prince Charles Hospital.

METHODS

The viability of pulmonary valves was quantitatively analyzed by thin-layer autoradiography to assess the effects of donor type, antibiotics, and valve storage.

RESULTS

Control valve segments obtained from beating-heart donor valves had a higher initial viability (0.92+/-0.02) than nonbeating-heart donor valves (0.66+/-0.03). Cryopreservation after low-dose antibiotic sterilization significantly reduced viability to 50% to 60% of the control, and in the presence of amphotericin B, viability dropped further to 10% to 36% of the control. After 7 days' storage at 4 degrees C, viability was reduced to 2% of control and to 0% viability after 21 days.

CONCLUSIONS

For maximal preimplantation viability, valves should be procured as soon as possible after cessation of heart beat and should be cryopreserved if they are not to be clinically implanted within 1 to 2 days. Amphotericin B should not be used in conjunction with cryopreservation if viability is to be maximized.

摘要

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验