Suppr超能文献

吸入用丙酸倍氯米松与曲安奈德治疗持续性哮喘的临床对比研究

Comparative clinical study of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate and triamcinolone acetonide in persistent asthma.

作者信息

Bronsky E, Korenblat P, Harris A G, Chen R

机构信息

Intermountain Clinical Research, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102, USA.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1998 Apr;80(4):295-302. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62972-9.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

At this time, no placebo-controlled studies in the clinical literature compare the efficacy and safety of the most widely prescribed oral inhaled corticosteroids when dosed at their recommended daily doses. This study compared the efficacy and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) 336 microg/day administered by metered dose inhaler (MDI) alone, and triamcinolone acetonide (TA) 800 microg/day by MDI with a built-in tube extender in adults with persistent asthma.

METHODS

This 56-day, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial was conducted in 328 adults with mild to moderately severe asthma (FEV1 50% to 90% of predicted while maintained on inhaled corticosteroids). Patients were seen at a baseline visit and on study days 28 and 56. Efficacy variables included pulmonary function tests, physician and patient assessments of asthma condition, and use of rescue medication.

RESULTS

Statistically significant improvements from baseline in most efficacy measures were demonstrated for both active treatments versus placebo, and with the following exception were the same between active treatments: mean increase in FEV1 in the beclomethasone dipropionate group was statistically significantly greater than in the triamcinolone acetonide group on day 28. Throughout the study, BDP was statistically superior to TA with respect to mean change from baseline in total asthma symptom scores and for 3 of 8 weeks in reducing the mean average weekly use of rescue albuterol (the two active treatments were comparable for this variable at all other time points). Beclomethasone dipropionate and TA were comparable in safety.

CONCLUSION

In adult patients with mild to moderately severe persistent asthma, treatment with BDP consistently conferred greater improvement from baseline in mean FEV1 than TA. This difference achieved statistical significance after 28 days of therapy but was not maintained to endpoint. Decreases in overall asthma symptom scores and in the use of rescue albuterol were statistically significantly greater for the BDP group compared with the TA group. Based on these findings, we conclude that BDP is at least as effective as TA in the treatment of persistent asthma in adults, and judged by some measures, may be superior.

摘要

未标注

目前,临床文献中尚无安慰剂对照研究比较最常用的口服吸入皮质类固醇在推荐日剂量下的疗效和安全性。本研究比较了在持续性哮喘成人患者中,单独使用定量吸入器(MDI)给予丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)336微克/天,以及使用带有内置延长管的MDI给予曲安奈德(TA)800微克/天的疗效和安全性。

方法

这项为期56天的随机、双盲、双模拟、安慰剂对照、多中心试验纳入了328例轻度至中度重度哮喘成人患者(吸入皮质类固醇维持治疗时,FEV1为预测值的50%至90%)。在基线访视以及研究第28天和第56天对患者进行观察。疗效变量包括肺功能测试、医生和患者对哮喘状况的评估以及急救药物的使用。

结果

与安慰剂相比,两种活性治疗在大多数疗效指标上均显示出与基线相比有统计学意义的改善,且除以下情况外,两种活性治疗之间相同:在第28天,丙酸倍氯米松组FEV1的平均增加在统计学上显著大于曲安奈德组。在整个研究过程中,就总哮喘症状评分相对于基线的平均变化以及在8周中的3周内减少沙丁胺醇急救药物的平均每周使用量而言,BDP在统计学上优于TA(在所有其他时间点,两种活性治疗在该变量上相当)。丙酸倍氯米松和TA在安全性方面相当。

结论

在轻度至中度重度持续性哮喘的成年患者中,与TA相比,BDP治疗使平均FEV1较基线持续有更大改善。这种差异在治疗28天后达到统计学意义,但未维持至终点。与TA组相比,BDP组的总体哮喘症状评分和沙丁胺醇急救药物使用量的下降在统计学上显著更大。基于这些发现,我们得出结论,BDP在治疗成人持续性哮喘方面至少与TA一样有效,并且从某些指标判断,可能更优。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验