Socolar R R, Raines B, Chen-Mok M, Runyan D K, Green C, Paterno S
Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7225, USA.
Pediatrics. 1998 May;101(5):817-24. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.5.817.
To determine if written feedback improves the chart documentation and knowledge of physicians doing evaluations for child sexual abuse and to learn what other factors are associated with better documentation and knowledge.
Randomized, controlled trial.
A statewide network of physicians performing child abuse evaluations.
All physicians who performed evaluations for sexual abuse during 1991 to 1992. One hundred forty-seven physicians were randomized to control (n = 75) and intervention (n = 72) groups, 122 (83%) remained at follow-up, and 87 of the 122 (71%) had done evaluations for child sexual abuse.
Tailored written feedback based on chart reviews and relevant articles were sent to a randomly selected one-half of the physicians during a 3-month period.
The quality of documentation and physician knowledge before and after the intervention.
Documentation by chart review of up to five randomly chosen records per physician (preintervention, n = 552; postintervention, n = 259) by reviewers blinded to intervention status and physician knowledge was assessed by survey (78% completion). Change in documentation and knowledge for physicians in the intervention group was not statistically significant compared with the control group. The risk ratio for a mean overall history rating of excellent/good was 0.89 (0.63, 1.25) and for a mean overall physical examination rating of excellent/good was 1.03 (0.73, 1.45). Both groups improved significantly during the time period. The largest improvements in the time period were in documenting the history of where abuse occurred, in the physical examination position, hymenal description, penile findings, and knowing that chlamydia infection should be assessed by culture. A structured medical record, female physicians, and credits in continuing medical education were associated with better documentation.
Tailored feedback to the physician with directed educational materials did not seem to improve most aspects of documentation and knowledge of child sexual abuse, although notable improvement was seen during the time period studied. This study suggests that chart audits may not be the best use of resources for trying to improve physician behavior; credits in continuing medical education and use of structured records may be more likely to be beneficial.
确定书面反馈是否能改善医生对儿童性虐待进行评估时的病历记录情况及相关知识,并了解还有哪些其他因素与更好的记录和知识相关。
随机对照试验。
一个进行全州范围儿童虐待评估的医生网络。
1991年至1992年期间所有进行性虐待评估的医生。147名医生被随机分为对照组(n = 75)和干预组(n = 72),122名(83%)参与随访,其中87名(71%)对儿童性虐待进行了评估。
在3个月期间,向随机抽取的一半医生发送基于病历审查和相关文章的定制书面反馈。
干预前后的记录质量和医生知识。
由对干预状态不知情的评审人员对每位医生随机抽取的多达5份记录进行病历审查(干预前,n = 552;干预后,n = 259),并通过调查评估医生知识(完成率78%)。与对照组相比,干预组医生在记录和知识方面的变化无统计学意义。总体病史评为优秀/良好的风险比为0.89(0.63,1.25),总体体格检查评为优秀/良好的风险比为1.03(0.73,1.45)。在此期间两组均有显著改善。在此期间最大的改善在于记录虐待发生地点的病史、体格检查体位、处女膜描述、阴茎检查结果,以及知道应通过培养评估衣原体感染。结构化病历、女医生以及继续医学教育学分与更好的记录相关。
向医生提供定制反馈及定向教育材料似乎并未改善儿童性虐待记录和知识的大多数方面,尽管在所研究的时间段内有明显改善。本研究表明,病历审核可能并非改善医生行为的最佳资源利用方式;继续医学教育学分和使用结构化记录可能更有益。