Röding K
Karolinska Institutet, Department of Medical Informatics and Education, Huddinge, Sweden.
Eur J Dent Educ. 1997 Aug;1(3):114-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.1997.tb00020.x.
This study compares the performance to date of dental under-graduates selected by a new, individual admissions procedure, and those admitted by the traditional centralised system (control groups). Admission to all full-time tertiary study in Sweden was centralised and administered by special national units until 1993, following which the universities were allowed to adopt their own admission system. The Dental School at The Karolinska Institute in 1993 introduced an individualised selection system, initially for one-third and subsequently for 60% of the freshmen intake, the remaining places being reserved for students applying through the national admissions centre. The main objective of the new selection procedure is to seek out highly motivated students (less likely to drop-out) with general competence, high academic achievement, and personal attributes considered important in a health professional. An Admissions Committee (AC) comprising seven faculty members, was appointed by the Vice-Chancellor, for the new system which has been used unaltered since 1993. In the first stage applicants with the highest academic grades are selected in descending order. In the second stage, the prospective students spend a day at The Dental School writing separate assignments, which are assessed by the AC according to defined criteria. Applicants who do well in the written assessment proceed to the third stage in which each applicant is interviewed by two AC members on separate occasions. In the final selection procedure, the AC considers the combined merits of all the interviewed applicants. Analysis of the first three intakes discloses few or no drop-outs among AC-selected undergraduates. In three major integrated examinations, designed to disclose not only factual knowledge but also comprehension and maturity and as such reflect clinical conditions, their performance is as good as or better than the control groups.
本研究比较了通过一种新的个人录取程序选拔的牙科本科生与通过传统集中录取系统录取的学生(对照组)迄今为止的表现。直到1993年,瑞典所有全日制高等教育的录取都是集中进行的,并由国家专门机构管理,此后各大学被允许采用自己的录取系统。卡罗林斯卡学院牙科学院于1993年引入了个性化选拔系统,最初用于三分之一的新生,随后用于60%的新生,其余名额保留给通过国家录取中心申请的学生。新选拔程序的主要目标是找出积极性高(辍学可能性较小)、具备一般能力、学术成绩优异且具有健康专业人员认为重要的个人特质的学生。由副校长任命了一个由七名教员组成的录取委员会(AC),负责自1993年以来一直未变的新系统。在第一阶段,按学术成绩从高到低选出成绩最高的申请者。在第二阶段,准学生在牙科学院花一天时间撰写单独的作业,录取委员会根据既定标准对其进行评估。在书面评估中表现出色的申请者进入第三阶段,在此阶段,每位申请者由两名录取委员会成员分别进行面试。在最终选拔程序中,录取委员会考虑所有接受面试的申请者的综合优点。对前三批录取学生的分析表明,录取委员会选拔的本科生中很少或几乎没有辍学现象。在三项主要的综合考试中,这些考试不仅旨在考查事实性知识,还考查理解能力和成熟度,因此反映了临床情况,他们的表现与对照组一样好或更好。