Fanning G C, Welsh K I, Bunn C, Du Bois R, Black C M
Tissue Typing Laboratories, Oxford Transplant Centre, Churchill Hospital.
Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Feb;37(2):201-7. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.2.201.
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterized by the presence of autoantibodies, mostly IgG, which target a limited set of nuclear proteins. These antinuclear antibodies (ANA) associate with disease subgroups and specific organ involvement. Here we show that there is mutual exclusivity of individual ANA in 130 UK SSc patients, confirm clinical associations with antibody profile and extend the analysis to include genetic data. The ANA mutual exclusivity observed leads to the possibility that SSc, in these patients, is in fact three separate diseases. An alternative explanation for exclusivity relates to the fact that optimal production of IgG antibody requires T-cell help, a process restricted by the HLA class II presentation of antigen peptide. If each autoantibody has a different and tight MHC restriction, then there is a possibility that these groups arose from a common pathway and were modified by genetics into the mutually exclusive groups observed, making the separate disease theory less tenable. In order to answer this question, we have determined MHC class II restriction precisely using high-resolution HLA genotyping (SSP) coupled with an amino acid analysis program in our 130 UK SSc patients. DRB111 was associated with anti-topoisomerase-I antibody (ATA)-positive patients (P = 0.007) and when combined with ATA (RR = 15.82), dcSSc (RR = 11.45), or both (RR = 21.9), represented the strongest risk factor for pulmonary fibrosis. Patients with antibodies to RNA polymerases I, II and III were associated with DQB10201. At the amino acid level, 20 positions in DRB1 and 20 positions in DQB1 showed some significant correlation with an ANA group. Clearly, however, the linkages to MHC class II alleles are not nearly strong enough to explain the mutually exclusive nature of the autoantibody groups and our results support, but do not prove, the separate disease theory.
系统性硬化症(SSc)的特征是存在自身抗体,主要是IgG,其靶向一组有限的核蛋白。这些抗核抗体(ANA)与疾病亚组和特定器官受累相关。在此我们表明,130名英国SSc患者中个体ANA存在相互排斥性,证实了与抗体谱的临床关联,并将分析扩展至包括基因数据。观察到的ANA相互排斥性使得这些患者的SSc实际上可能是三种不同疾病。相互排斥性的另一种解释涉及这样一个事实,即IgG抗体的最佳产生需要T细胞辅助,这一过程受抗原肽的HLA II类呈递限制。如果每种自身抗体具有不同且严格的MHC限制,那么这些组有可能源自共同途径,并通过基因修饰形成观察到的相互排斥组,这使得独立疾病理论的可信度降低。为了回答这个问题,我们在130名英国SSc患者中,通过高分辨率HLA基因分型(SSP)结合氨基酸分析程序精确确定了MHC II类限制。DRB111与抗拓扑异构酶-I抗体(ATA)阳性患者相关(P = 0.007),当与ATA(相对风险[RR]= 15.82)、弥漫性皮肤型系统性硬化症(dcSSc,RR = 11.45)或两者(RR = 21.9)结合时,是肺纤维化的最强风险因素。抗RNA聚合酶I、II和III抗体的患者与DQB10201相关。在氨基酸水平上,DRB1中的20个位置和DQB1中的20个位置与一个ANA组存在一些显著相关性。然而,显然与MHC II类等位基因的联系还不够强,不足以解释自身抗体组的相互排斥性质,我们的结果支持但未证明独立疾病理论。