• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

职业环境中医疗保密的法律问题。

Legal aspects of medical confidentiality in the occupational setting.

作者信息

Annas G J

出版信息

J Occup Med. 1976 Aug;18(8):537-40. doi: 10.1097/00043764-197608000-00006.

DOI:10.1097/00043764-197608000-00006
PMID:956937
Abstract

The law of confidentiality of medical information in the occupational setting is undeveloped and subject to change. Nevertheless, when a physician-patient relationship is established, all of the traditional trappings, including the duty to maintain confidences, go along with it. In other settings, such as preemployment physicals, examinees implicitly consent for their "fitness' for the job to be disclosed, but do not assume that specific findings will be disclosed without their informed and written consent. To promote physician automony and worker confidence in the occupational physician, an explicit policy of confidentiality should be developed and agreed to by both management and workers. This policy should spell out the conditions under which specific information will be made available to the employer and should guarantee the confidentiality of all other medical information. Workers should also be given routine access to their medical files, and offered the chance to refute and have amended information in them that they can demonstrate is inaccurate. In short, workers in the occupational setting should, in general, be treated like private patients. Such a policy will satisfy both the law and the ethical standards of physicians, and will promote worker trust in the occupational physician.

摘要

职业环境中医疗信息保密法尚不完善且可能会发生变化。然而,一旦建立医患关系,所有传统的相关要求,包括保密义务,都会随之而来。在其他情况下,如入职前体检,受检者默示同意披露其工作“适应性”情况,但不要认为未经其知情且书面同意就会披露具体检查结果。为了增强医生的自主性以及员工对职业医生的信任,应制定一项明确的保密政策,并由管理层和员工共同认可。该政策应详细说明在何种情况下会向雇主提供特定信息,并应保证所有其他医疗信息的保密性。还应让员工能够定期查阅自己的医疗档案,并有机会反驳和修改其中他们能证明不准确的信息。简而言之,职业环境中的员工总体上应被当作普通患者来对待。这样的政策将既符合法律要求,又符合医生的道德标准,还能增进员工对职业医生的信任。

相似文献

1
Legal aspects of medical confidentiality in the occupational setting.职业环境中医疗保密的法律问题。
J Occup Med. 1976 Aug;18(8):537-40. doi: 10.1097/00043764-197608000-00006.
2
CONFIDENTIALITY OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH RECORDS.职业健康记录的保密性。
Arch Environ Health. 1963 Oct;7:469-72. doi: 10.1080/00039896.1963.10663567.
3
Confidences of malpractice plaintiffs: should their secrets be revealed?
South Tex Law Rev. 1987 Spring;28(1):71-95.
4
The confidentiality of medical information in the workplace.工作场所中医疗信息的保密性。
J Occup Environ Med. 1995 May;37(5):583-93. doi: 10.1097/00043764-199505000-00006.
5
Marijuana in the Workplace: Guidance for Occupational Health Professionals and Employers: Joint Guidance Statement of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses and the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.工作场所中的大麻:职业健康专业人员和雇主指南:美国职业健康护士协会与美国职业与环境医学学院联合指南声明
Workplace Health Saf. 2015 Apr;63(4):139-64. doi: 10.1177/2165079915581983. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
6
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
7
Suing the doctor: lawsuits by injured workers against the occupational physician.起诉医生:受伤工人对职业医师提起的诉讼。
J Occup Med. 1989 Nov;31(11):891-6. doi: 10.1097/00043764-198911000-00009.
8
Ethical dilemmas in providing health care to workers.为工人提供医疗保健中的伦理困境。
Ann Intern Med. 1987 Oct;107(4):575-80. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-107-4-575.
9
The employment physical examination: what is the doctor's obligation of confidentiality?入职体检:医生的保密义务是什么?
Can Fam Physician. 1982 Apr;28:673-674, 790.
10
Legal issues confronting the occupational physician.职业医师面临的法律问题。
Occup Med. 2002 Oct-Dec;17(4):625-35.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethical conduct and the occupational physician.道德行为与职业医师
Bull N Y Acad Med. 1978 Sep;54(8):733-41.