Hall J W, Grose J H, Buss E, Hatch D R
Division of Otolaryngology/Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-7070, USA.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998 Apr;41(2):340-54. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4102.340.
The first experiment investigated the effects of mild to moderate sensorineural hearing impairment on temporal analysis for noise stimuli of varying bandwidth. Tasks of temporal gap detection, amplitude modulation (AM) detection, and AM discrimination were examined. Relatively high levels of stimulation were used in order to reduce the possibility that the results of the listeners with hearing impairment would be influenced strongly by audibility. A general summary of results was that there was relatively great interlistener variation among the listeners with hearing impairment, with most listeners showing normal performance and some showing degraded performance, regardless of the bandwidth of the stimulus carrying the temporal information. A second experiment investigated the hypothesis that listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment might have poor gap detection due to loudness recruitment. Here, gap markers were presented at levels where loudness growth was steeper for the listeners with hearing impairment than for the listeners with normal hearing. Although gap detection was sometimes poorer in listeners with hearing impairment than in listeners with normal hearing, there was no clear relation between gap detection performance and loudness recruitment in listeners with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing impairment.
第一个实验研究了轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失对不同带宽噪声刺激的时间分析的影响。对时间间隔检测、幅度调制(AM)检测和AM辨别任务进行了检查。为了降低听力受损听众的结果受可听度强烈影响的可能性,使用了相对较高水平的刺激。结果的总体总结是,听力受损听众之间存在相对较大的个体差异,无论携带时间信息的刺激的带宽如何,大多数听众表现正常,一些听众表现下降。第二个实验研究了这样一个假设,即感音神经性听力损失的听众可能由于响度重振而存在较差的间隔检测能力。在这里,间隙标记呈现的水平对于听力受损听众来说响度增长比听力正常的听众更陡峭。尽管听力受损听众的间隙检测有时比听力正常的听众差,但在轻度至中度感音神经性听力损失的听众中,间隙检测性能与响度重振之间没有明确的关系。