Wiseman L R, Spencer C M
Adis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
Drugs Aging. 1998 Apr;12(4):305-34. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199812040-00005.
The antitumour agent paclitaxel has proved to be effective for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast or ovarian cancer, and limited data also indicate its clinical potential in patients with cervical or endometrial cancer. The regimen of paclitaxel administration has varied in clinical trials, the most common including a dosage of between 135 and 250 mg/m2 administered over an infusion period of 3 or 24 hours once every 3 weeks. Promising results have been achieved in phase I/II trials of a weekly regimen of paclitaxel (60 to 175 mg/m2). The objective response rate in patients with metastatic breast cancer (either pretreated or chemotherapy-naive) is generally between 20 and 35% with paclitaxel monotherapy, which compares well with that of other current treatment options including the anthracycline doxorubicin. Combination therapy with paclitaxel plus doxorubicin appears superior to treatment with either agent alone in terms of objective response rate and median duration of response. However, whether combination therapy also provides a survival advantage remains unclear; recent results of a phase III study indicate that it does not. Paclitaxel is also a useful second-line option in some patients with anthracycline-resistant disease. Combination therapy with paclitaxel and cisplatin has proved highly effective as first-line therapy for patients with advanced ovarian cancer, showing superior efficacy to cyclophosphamide/cisplatin in terms of progression-free survival time and median duration of survival. Combination therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin has also shown promising results. Paclitaxel monotherapy is a useful second-line option for patients with platinum-refractory metastatic ovarian cancer (objective response rates have ranged from 15 to 48%). The major dose-limiting adverse events associated with paclitaxel include myelotoxicity and peripheral neuropathy. Paclitaxel has acceptable tolerability in most patients, although adverse events are common.
Paclitaxel generally appears to be as effective as other antineoplastic agents used in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, including doxorubicin. Importantly, it is a useful second-line option for some patients with anthracycline-resistant disease. Combination therapy with both paclitaxel and doxorubicin is a highly effective first-line option for metastatic breast cancer; however, recent results indicate no survival advantage versus monotherapy. Paclitaxel is a valuable agent for second-line treatment of patients with platinum-refractory metastatic ovarian cancer and, when combined with cisplatin or carboplatin, is recommended as first-line therapy for this disease.
抗肿瘤药物紫杉醇已被证明对转移性乳腺癌或卵巢癌患者的治疗有效,有限的数据也表明其在宫颈癌或子宫内膜癌患者中的临床潜力。紫杉醇的给药方案在临床试验中有所不同,最常见的包括每3周一次,在3小时或24小时的输注期内给予135至250mg/m²的剂量。紫杉醇每周方案(60至175mg/m²)的I/II期试验已取得了有前景的结果。紫杉醇单药治疗转移性乳腺癌患者(无论是预处理患者还是未接受过化疗的患者)的客观缓解率一般在20%至35%之间,与包括蒽环类药物阿霉素在内的其他当前治疗选择相比效果良好。紫杉醇加阿霉素的联合治疗在客观缓解率和中位缓解持续时间方面似乎优于单独使用任何一种药物的治疗。然而,联合治疗是否也能提供生存优势仍不清楚;一项III期研究的最新结果表明并非如此。对于一些对蒽环类药物耐药的患者,紫杉醇也是一种有用的二线选择。紫杉醇和顺铂的联合治疗已被证明是晚期卵巢癌患者的高效一线治疗方法,在无进展生存时间和中位生存持续时间方面显示出比环磷酰胺/顺铂更高的疗效。紫杉醇和卡铂的联合治疗也显示出有前景的结果。紫杉醇单药治疗是铂耐药转移性卵巢癌患者的有用二线选择(客观缓解率在15%至48%之间)。与紫杉醇相关的主要剂量限制性不良事件包括骨髓毒性和周围神经病变。尽管不良事件很常见,但紫杉醇在大多数患者中具有可接受的耐受性。
紫杉醇总体上似乎与用于治疗转移性乳腺癌的其他抗肿瘤药物(包括阿霉素)一样有效。重要的是,对于一些对蒽环类药物耐药的患者,它是一种有用的二线选择。紫杉醇和阿霉素的联合治疗是转移性乳腺癌的高效一线选择;然而,最近的结果表明与单药治疗相比没有生存优势。紫杉醇是铂耐药转移性卵巢癌患者二线治疗的有价值药物,并且与顺铂或卡铂联合使用时,被推荐为此病的一线治疗方法。