Kurbacher C M, Bruckner H W, Cree I A, Kurbacher J A, Wilhelm L, Pöch G, Indefrei D, Mallmann P, Andreotti P E
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Cologne Medical Center, D-50931 Cologne, Germany.
Clin Cancer Res. 1997 Sep;3(9):1527-33.
This report describes preclinical and early clinical investigations of the mitoxantrone/paclitaxel combination (NT) for patients with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. The preclinical activity of NT was studied ex vivo, evaluating native tumor specimens with the ATP tumor chemosensitivity assay. Of 24 tumors tested, 20 (83%) were sensitive to NT, whereas 7 (29%) responded to mitoxantrone and 8 (33%) responded to paclitaxel. In the majority of tumors assayed (19 of 24), potentiating or major independent effects between both agents were found. Subsequently, a clinical pilot trial of NT was initiated for patients with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. Patients had failed one to four (median, two) prior chemotherapy regimens. In 11 cases, NT was administered every three weeks with 8 mg/m2 mito-xantrone and 180 mg/m2 paclitaxel (NT-I). Seven patients were treated biweekly with 6 mg/m2 mitoxantrone and weekly with 100 mg/m2 paclitaxel (NT-II). During 92 NT courses, myelosuppression with leucopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia was the limiting toxicity, occurring more frequently with NT-II. No patient required hospitalization due to any life-threatening complication. Five complete and nine partial remissions were observed with both NT-I and NT-II, accounting for an overall 78% response rate, with a median progression-free survival of 40 weeks. One patient showed early progression during therapy. Currently, three patients (NT-I, two; NT-II, one) have died due to progressive relapsed ovarian cancer, so that the median overall survival is not reached after a median follow-up of 40.5+ weeks. Both schedules were found to be equal in terms of response rate and overall survival. NT is highly active and practical for salvage treatment of ovarian cancer. NT-II may be preferred due to both clinical activity and patients' acceptance. However, NT-I seems to be a less myelotoxic alternative. Both schedules warrant further clinical investigation.
本报告描述了米托蒽醌/紫杉醇联合方案(NT)用于铂类难治性卵巢癌患者的临床前及早期临床研究。通过体外研究NT的临床前活性,采用ATP肿瘤化疗敏感性试验评估原发性肿瘤标本。在检测的24个肿瘤中,20个(83%)对NT敏感,而7个(29%)对米托蒽醌有反应,8个(33%)对紫杉醇有反应。在大多数检测的肿瘤中(24个中的19个),发现两种药物之间有增强作用或主要的独立作用。随后,针对铂类难治性卵巢癌患者启动了NT的临床试点试验。患者之前接受过一至四种(中位数为两种)化疗方案且治疗失败。11例患者每三周接受一次NT治疗,米托蒽醌剂量为8mg/m²,紫杉醇剂量为180mg/m²(NT-I)。7例患者每两周接受6mg/m²米托蒽醌治疗,每周接受100mg/m²紫杉醇治疗(NT-II)。在92个NT疗程中,白细胞减少、贫血和血小板减少的骨髓抑制是限制毒性,在NT-II中更频繁发生。没有患者因任何危及生命的并发症而需要住院治疗。NT-I和NT-II均观察到5例完全缓解和9例部分缓解,总缓解率为78%,无进展生存期中位数为40周。1例患者在治疗期间出现早期进展。目前,3例患者(NT-I,2例;NT-II,1例)因复发性卵巢癌进展而死亡,因此在中位随访40.5 +周后未达到中位总生存期。两种方案在缓解率和总生存期方面相当。NT对卵巢癌的挽救治疗具有高活性且实用。由于临床活性和患者接受度,NT-II可能更受青睐。然而,NT-I似乎是骨髓毒性较小的替代方案。两种方案均值得进一步临床研究。