Suppr超能文献

马达加斯加东南部三种原猴灵长类动物对种子的处理:对种子传播的影响。

Seed handling by three prosimian primates in southeastern Madagascar: implications for seed dispersal.

作者信息

Overdorff D J, Strait S G

机构信息

Department of Anthropology, University of Texas-Austin 78712-1086, USA.

出版信息

Am J Primatol. 1998;45(1):69-82. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1998)45:1<69::AID-AJP6>3.0.CO;2-U.

Abstract

In this paper, we studied three species of prosimian primate (Propithecus diadema edwardsi, Eulemur fulvus rufus, and Eulemur rubriventer) from June-July 1995 at the Ranomafana National Park to answer three questions: 1) how they handle and process seeds, 2) how the physical properties of seeds influence seed handling and seed fate, and 3) whether handling and processing patterns influence seed dispersal. Seeds from five plant species were collected from feces and examined for external damage (punctures and scrapes), weighed, measured, and checked daily for germination. P. d. edwardsi masticated seeds into two or more pieces while feeding. Seed fragments were either dropped under the parent tree or chewed and swallowed; seeds never emerged as recognizable units in feces. In contrast, both Eulemur species either dropped or swallowed seeds whole while feeding. E. rubriventer passed seeds that were longer, wider, and heavier than seeds passed by E.f. rufus. Although seeds emerged as separate units when passed by both Eulemur species, 65 Protorhus sp. seeds were scraped and/or punctured prior to being swallowed. Based on physical property tests, Protorhus seeds were more susceptible to mastication than undamaged seeds from Eugenia sp., Cissus sp., and Chrysophyllum madagascariensis. H. madagascariensis seeds also were undamaged but had physical properties comparable to Protorhus and may avoid being masticated due to their small size (2-3 mm). All damaged seeds were moldy or rotten within 6 days, and only 15% of the undamaged seeds passed by E. rubriventer germinated. None of the seeds passed by E.f. rufus germinated. Eulemur species also rested in the same tree after feeding and defecated prior to a new feeding bout or before moving, so seeds were most likely to be dispersed under the parent tree. Consequently, we concluded that these primate species do not appear to serve as effective seed dispersers for these plant species at this time of year.

摘要

1995年6月至7月,我们在拉努马法纳国家公园对三种原猴灵长类动物(冕狐猴、红领狐猴和红腹狐猴)进行了研究,以回答三个问题:1)它们如何处理和加工种子;2)种子的物理特性如何影响种子处理和种子命运;3)处理和加工方式是否影响种子传播。从粪便中收集了五种植物的种子,检查其外部损伤(穿刺和擦伤),称重、测量,并每天检查发芽情况。冕狐猴在进食时将种子咀嚼成两块或更多块。种子碎片要么掉落在母树下,要么被咀嚼并吞咽;种子从未以可识别的单位出现在粪便中。相比之下,两种狐猴在进食时要么将种子整个掉落,要么整个吞咽。红腹狐猴排出的种子比红领狐猴排出的种子更长、更宽、更重。尽管两种狐猴排出的种子都是单独的,但65颗原猴属种子在被吞咽之前被刮擦和/或穿刺。根据物理特性测试,原猴属种子比番樱桃属、白粉藤属和马达加斯加金叶树未受损的种子更容易被咀嚼。马达加斯加金叶树的种子也未受损,但其物理特性与原猴属种子相当,可能因其体积小(2-3毫米)而避免被咀嚼。所有受损种子在6天内发霉或腐烂,红腹狐猴排出的未受损种子只有15%发芽。红领狐猴排出的种子没有一颗发芽。狐猴在进食后也会在同一棵树上休息,并在新的进食回合之前或移动之前排便,因此种子最有可能散落在母树下。因此,我们得出结论,在一年中的这个时候这些灵长类物种似乎并没有起到这些植物物种有效种子传播者的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验