Suppr超能文献

[长期家庭氧疗:对象是谁?使用何种方式?费用多少?]

[Long-term home oxygen therapy: who? with what? how expensive?].

作者信息

Keller R

机构信息

Pneumologische Abteilung, Klinik Barmelweid.

出版信息

Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1998 Mar 21;128(12):435-41.

PMID:9577870
Abstract

Since 1981 long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) has become an important procedure for the rehabilitation of patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency in Switzerland too. As a result of long-term clinical experience as well as technical progress, there is, however, increasing need for an updated reassessment of guidelines and standardized management respectively: the indications for LTOT-so far restricted to patients with COPD-are extended to patients with pulmonary diseases other than COPD associated with chronic hypoxemia (pO2 < 7.3 kPa) provided there is enough evidence of clinical benefit. Another important aspect of LTOT focuses on the appropriate application of different oxygen sources. Oxygen concentrators are still accepted to be the most economic domiciliary source. For short-term outdoor activities, small portable cylinders in combination with an oxygen conserving system should be used. However, in regular mobile oxygen therapy liquid oxygen is the best choice, generally consisting of a domiciliary reservoir and portable canisters. Delivery of oxygen through a transtracheal catheter is superior to nasal cannula because of lower oxygen consumption, decreased breathing work and improved compliance respectively. To organize and follow-up LTOT in Switzerland, a very efficient concept was introduced many years ago which is characterized by economical cooperation between physicians, insurances, technical suppliers and social providers. Today more than 3000 patients-corresponding to 38/100,000 inhabitants-benefit from LTOT. Future perspectives should target an earlier start to continuous as well as mobile LTOT, in order to improve rehabilitation in still active conditions instead of merely palliating the terminal stages.

摘要

自1981年以来,长期氧疗(LTOT)在瑞士也已成为慢性呼吸功能不全患者康复的重要手段。然而,基于长期临床经验以及技术进步,对指南和标准化管理进行更新再评估的需求日益增加:LTOT的适应症——迄今为止仅限于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者——扩展至患有除COPD以外其他伴有慢性低氧血症(动脉血氧分压<7.3kPa)肺部疾病的患者,前提是有足够的临床获益证据。LTOT的另一个重要方面集中在不同氧源的恰当应用。氧气浓缩器仍被认为是最经济的家用氧源。对于短期户外活动,应使用小型便携式气瓶并搭配氧疗节省装置。然而,在常规移动氧疗中,液氧是最佳选择,通常由一个家用储存器和便携式储氧罐组成。经气管导管输氧优于鼻导管输氧,因为其耗氧量更低、呼吸功减少且顺应性更好。为在瑞士组织和随访LTOT,多年前引入了一个非常有效的理念,其特点是医生、保险公司、技术供应商和社会服务机构之间的经济合作。如今,超过3000名患者——相当于每10万居民中有38人——受益于LTOT。未来展望应着眼于更早开始持续及移动LTOT,以便在患者仍处于活动状态时改善康复情况,而非仅仅缓解终末期症状。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验