Baas H, Harder S, Bürklin F, Demisch L, Fischer P A
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Frankfurt/Main, Germany.
Clin Neuropharmacol. 1998 Mar-Apr;21(2):86-92.
The modification of the pharmacodynamic response to a single oral dose of levodopa/benserazide by the coadministration of the dopamine agonist apomorphine was investigated in parkinsonian patients with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. The relation between levodopa plasma concentrations and motor response was examined in a double-blind, randomized, crossover design in 10 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease with end-of-dose motor fluctuations. Oral single-dose challenges with 100 mg of levodopa/25 mg of benserazide were carried out twice in each patient, under coadministration with apomorphine (1 mg/h) or 0.9% saline (placebo) subcutaneously. The sum scores (sigma score) of the Columbia University Rating Scale (CURS) were used as effect parameters for pharmacodynamic assessment. A sigmoidal Emax model was fitted to the data using a semiparametric pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic approach. Levodopa pharmacokinetics were not significantly modified by the coadministration of apomorphine. The area under the curve was 1599 +/- 615 ng.ml-1 h. (levodopa + saline) and 1821 +/- 625 ng.ml-1.h (levodopa + apomorphine). Cmax was 1094 +/- 476 ng.ml-1 (levodopa + saline) and 1129 +/- 435 ng.ml-1 (levodopa + apomorphine). Under both experimental regimens, the maximum clinical response to levodopa (Emax) yielded a decrease in the CURS sigma rating of about 20 score points. Estimates of the EC50 of levodopa decreased significantly from 430 +/- 163 ng.ml-1 (levodopa + saline) to 315 +/- 123 ng+ml-1 (levodopa + apomorphine) (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 -0.98, point estimator 0.75). The mean duration of the motor response rose from 1.9 +/- 0.5 h (levodopa + saline) to 3.0 +/- 0.9 h (levodopa + apomorphine (95% CI 1.23 to 2.06, point estimator 1.60). Thus, a reduction of the threshold levels for levodopa (EC50) was accompanied by approximately 50% gain in on-phase duration, but not in an increased magnitude of the motor response (Emax).
在出现剂末运动波动的帕金森病患者中,研究了多巴胺激动剂阿扑吗啡与左旋多巴/苄丝肼单剂量口服联合用药时对药效学反应的影响。采用双盲、随机、交叉设计,对10例出现剂末运动波动的特发性帕金森病患者,研究左旋多巴血药浓度与运动反应之间的关系。每位患者均接受两次口服100mg左旋多巴/25mg苄丝肼的单剂量激发试验,同时皮下注射阿扑吗啡(1mg/h)或0.9%生理盐水(安慰剂)。哥伦比亚大学评定量表(CURS)的总分(sigma评分)用作药效学评估的效应参数。采用半参数药代动力学-药效学方法,对数据拟合S形Emax模型。阿扑吗啡与左旋多巴联合用药时,左旋多巴的药代动力学未发生显著改变。曲线下面积分别为(左旋多巴+生理盐水)1599±615ng·ml⁻¹·h和(左旋多巴+阿扑吗啡)1821±625ng·ml⁻¹·h。Cmax分别为(左旋多巴+生理盐水)1094±476ng·ml⁻¹和(左旋多巴+阿扑吗啡)1129±435ng·ml⁻¹。在两种试验方案下,左旋多巴的最大临床反应(Emax)使CURS sigma评分降低约20分。左旋多巴的EC50估计值从(左旋多巴+生理盐水)430±163ng·ml⁻¹显著降至(左旋多巴+阿扑吗啡)315±123ng·ml⁻¹(95%置信区间[CI]0.51 - 0.98,点估计值0.75)。运动反应的平均持续时间从(左旋多巴+生理盐水)1.9±0.5h增加至(左旋多巴+阿扑吗啡)3.0±0.9h(95%CI 1.23至2.06,点估计值1.60)。因此,左旋多巴阈值水平(EC50)降低的同时,开期持续时间增加了约50%,但运动反应幅度(Emax)并未增加。