• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ(APACHEⅢ)对重症外科患者进行风险分层及预后评估

[Risk stratification and prognosis in critical surgical patients using the Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health III System (APACHE III)].

作者信息

Carneiro A V, Leitão M P, Lopes M G, De Pádua F

机构信息

UCIM do Serviço de Medicina 4 e Serviço de Patologia Cirúrgica, Hospital Universitário de Santa Maria, Lisboa.

出版信息

Acta Med Port. 1997 Nov;10(11):751-60.

PMID:9580357
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Outcome prediction in critical surgical patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU) has been established using several scoring systems. To evaluate the predictive performance of the Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE III) scoring system in these patients, we studied a population admitted to a surgical ICU in our University Hospital.

METHODS

We collected prospective data on 220 consecutive patients admitted over a period of 12 months. APACHE III (A3) scores were obtained over the first 24 hours of ICU admission (APACHE II scores were also calculated); data also included age, sex, acute and chronic diseases, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), patient location prior to ICU admission and outcome. The relationship of hospital mortality with A3 scores was analyzed using logistic regression, with the discriminatory power of these systems being assessed by the area under the ROC curve and percentage of correct classification.

RESULTS

Patient's mean age was 57 +/- 17 years and 44% were male; 53.6% were elective and 46.4% were emergency postoperative patients; 5% of patients had co-morbidities; ICU mortality rate was 10% and in-hospital mortality rate (HMR) was 15%; mean ICU LOS was 3.9 +/- 5.6 days and mean hospital LOS was 9.4 +/- 8.2 days; mean scores were: APACHE III = 33 +/- 2 and APACHE II = 9 +/- 6 points. There was a significant relationship between ascending A3 scores and HMR. APACHE III had a correct classification rate of 87.3% and an area under the ROC curve of 0.830.

CONCLUSIONS

In a population of critical surgical patients admitted to our ICU the APACHE III scoring system demonstrated an excellent prognostic performance as measured by contingency tables and areas under the ROC curve; this system can be a useful tool for outcome prediction in critical surgical patients.

摘要

引言

使用多种评分系统已能对入住重症监护病房(ICU)的外科重症患者的预后进行预测。为评估急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE III)在这些患者中的预测性能,我们对我院外科ICU收治的患者群体进行了研究。

方法

我们收集了连续12个月收治的220例患者的前瞻性数据。在入住ICU的最初24小时内获取APACHE III(A3)评分(同时也计算了APACHE II评分);数据还包括年龄、性别、急慢性疾病、ICU住院时间和住院时间(LOS)、入住ICU前患者的位置以及预后情况。使用逻辑回归分析医院死亡率与A3评分的关系,通过ROC曲线下面积和正确分类百分比评估这些系统的鉴别能力。

结果

患者的平均年龄为57±17岁,44%为男性;53.6%为择期手术患者,46.4%为急诊术后患者;5%的患者有合并症;ICU死亡率为10%,住院死亡率(HMR)为15%;平均ICU住院时间为3.9±5.6天,平均住院时间为9.4±8.2天;平均评分如下:APACHE III = 33±2分,APACHE II = 9±6分。A3评分升高与HMR之间存在显著关系。APACHE III的正确分类率为87.3%,ROC曲线下面积为0.830。

结论

在我院ICU收治的外科重症患者群体中,APACHE III评分系统通过列联表和ROC曲线下面积测量显示出优异的预后预测性能;该系统可作为外科重症患者预后预测的有用工具。

相似文献

1
[Risk stratification and prognosis in critical surgical patients using the Acute Physiology, Age and Chronic Health III System (APACHE III)].使用急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ(APACHEⅢ)对重症外科患者进行风险分层及预后评估
Acta Med Port. 1997 Nov;10(11):751-60.
2
The acute physiology and chronic health evaluation III outcome prediction in patients admitted to the intensive care unit after pneumonectomy.肺切除术后入住重症监护病房患者的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估III结局预测
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Dec;21(6):832-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
3
Prospective cohort study comparing sequential organ failure assessment and acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation III scoring systems for hospital mortality prediction in critically ill cirrhotic patients.前瞻性队列研究,比较序贯器官衰竭评估和急性生理学与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ在预测重症肝硬化患者医院死亡率方面的作用。
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Feb;60(2):160-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2005.00634.x.
4
Serum osmolality and outcome in intensive care unit patients.重症监护病房患者的血清渗透压与预后
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Sep;50(8):970-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01096.x.
5
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE II) scoring in a cardiothoracic intensive care unit.心胸重症监护病房中的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE II)评分
Crit Care Med. 1991 Oct;19(10):1266-9.
6
Intensive care unit support and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III performance in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.重症监护病房支持与造血干细胞移植受者的急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估III表现
Crit Care Med. 2003 Jun;31(6):1715-21. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000065761.51367.2D.
7
[Comparing the performance of three severity scoring systems for ICU patients: APACHE III, SAPS II, MPM II].[比较三种重症监护病房患者严重程度评分系统的性能:急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅲ(APACHE III)、简化急性生理学评分系统Ⅱ(SAPS II)、死亡率预测模型Ⅱ(MPM II)]
J Prev Med Public Health. 2005 Aug;38(3):276-82.
8
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III outcome prediction after major vascular surgery.大血管手术后急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)III预后预测
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2008 Oct;22(5):713-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
9
Outcome prediction for critically ill cirrhotic patients: a comparison of APACHE II and Child-Pugh scoring systems.危重症肝硬化患者的预后预测:APACHE II评分系统与Child-Pugh评分系统的比较
J Intensive Care Med. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):105-10. doi: 10.1177/0885066603261991.
10
Prediction of mortality by using the standard scoring systems in a medical intensive care unit in Thailand.在泰国一家医疗重症监护病房中使用标准评分系统预测死亡率。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Jul;88(7):949-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Bench-to-bedside review: outcome predictions for critically ill patients in the emergency department.从实验室到临床的综述:急诊科危重症患者的预后预测
Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):376-83. doi: 10.1186/cc3518. Epub 2005 Apr 18.