Ochsner M, Greenberg M
Department of Urban Studies and Community Health, Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1958, USA.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1998 Apr;59(4):261-8. doi: 10.1080/15428119891010532.
This study reports the results of an analysis of responses from more than 400 New Jersey industrial hygienists and safety engineers to a survey examining a wide range of health and safety conditions and practices. Findings are reported on a number of variables including the types and seriousness of safety and health hazards encountered at the respondents' work sites, perceived improvements in health and safety conditions, compliance with right-to-know requirements, the effectiveness of resources used in correcting hazards, and the barriers encountered in addressing hazardous conditions. The respondents were also asked to rank their priorities regarding 14 proposals for Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) reform. Opinion questions were scaled to reflect the respondent's sense of the importance of each variable. One finding of particular interest is that worker involvement in health and safety committees was perceived as an "effective" or "very effective" resource by more than one-half of the respondents. Changes in the Occupational Safety and Health Act that would strengthen requirements for worker participation were among the respondents' top priorities for OSHA reform.
本研究报告了对400多名新泽西州工业卫生学家和安全工程师的调查回复进行分析的结果,该调查考察了广泛的健康与安全状况及实践。报告了关于若干变量的调查结果,包括受访者工作场所遇到的安全与健康危害的类型和严重程度、对健康与安全状况改善的认知、对知情权要求的遵守情况、用于纠正危害的资源的有效性,以及在处理危险状况时遇到的障碍。受访者还被要求对职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)改革的14项提议按优先顺序进行排序。意见问题进行了量化,以反映受访者对每个变量重要性的认识。一个特别有趣的发现是,超过一半的受访者认为工人参与健康与安全委员会是一种“有效”或“非常有效”的资源。加强工人参与要求的《职业安全与健康法》的修订是受访者对OSHA改革的首要优先事项之一。