• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

种植体周围透射区影像学诊断的准确性——一项体外实验

Accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of peri-implant radiolucencies--an in vitro experiment.

作者信息

Sewerin I P, Gotfredsen K, Stoltze K

机构信息

Department of Radiology, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Aug;8(4):299-304. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080408.x.

DOI:10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080408.x
PMID:9586477
Abstract

The absence of a peri-implant radiolucency on radiographs is used as a criterion for implant success. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of diagnosing peri-implant radiolucencies using an experimental model. Astra Tech fixtures were inserted into 20 bony specimens. Later, the fixtures were removed and the prepared cavities were enlarged in 2 steps. The specimens were radiographed under strictly standardized circumstances in the 3 stages ("press-fit" = simulated osseointegration, and "0.1 mm space" and "0.175 mm space" = simulated connective tissue layer). All specimens were radiographed with 2 vertical angulations (0 degree and 15 degrees). Ten observers read the radiographs and evaluated bone-implant relationship on a 5-point scale. The interobserver agreement was low. Specificity was remarkably low, and sensitivity was moderate. A significant difference in diagnostic accuracy was found for 0.175 mm peri-implant-space compared to 0.1 mm space. The diagnostic accuracy was found to be highest for 0.175 mm peri-implant space specimens. It is concluded, that radiography seems to be an unreliable method for diagnosing peri-implant spaces, although accuracy improved at increasing space widths. Strict orthogonal projection angles did not improve diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

X线片上种植体周围无透射区被用作种植成功的标准。本研究的目的是使用实验模型评估诊断种植体周围透射区的准确性。将Astra Tech种植体植入20个骨标本中。之后,取出种植体并分两步扩大预备的牙槽窝。在三个阶段(“压配”=模拟骨结合,“0.1 mm间隙”和“0.175 mm间隙”=模拟结缔组织层)在严格标准化的条件下对标本进行X线摄影。所有标本均以两个垂直角度(0度和15度)进行X线摄影。10名观察者阅读X线片并以5分制评估骨-种植体关系。观察者间的一致性较低。特异性显著较低,敏感性中等。与0.1 mm间隙相比,0.175 mm种植体周围间隙的诊断准确性存在显著差异。发现0.175 mm种植体周围间隙标本的诊断准确性最高。得出的结论是,尽管随着间隙宽度增加准确性有所提高,但X线摄影似乎是诊断种植体周围间隙的不可靠方法。严格的正交投照角度并未提高诊断准确性。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of radiographic diagnosis of peri-implant radiolucencies--an in vitro experiment.种植体周围透射区影像学诊断的准确性——一项体外实验
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Aug;8(4):299-304. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080408.x.
2
Radiographic follow-up analysis of Brånemark dental implants.布兰emark牙科种植体的影像学随访分析
Swed Dent J Suppl. 2008(194):5-69, 2.
3
Are Intraoral Radiographs Accurate in Determining the Peri-implant Marginal Bone Level?口腔内X光片在确定种植体周围边缘骨水平方面准确吗?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):847-852. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5352.
4
Inter- and intraobserver variability in radiographic bone level assessment at Brånemark fixtures.在Brånemark种植体处进行放射影像学骨水平评估时观察者间和观察者内的变异性。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998 Aug;9(4):243-50. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1998.090405.x.
5
Radiographic assessment of changes in marginal bone around endosseous implants supporting mandibular overdentures.下颌覆盖义齿种植体周围边缘骨变化的影像学评估
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1998 Jul;27(4):221-4. doi: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600354.
6
Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of peri-implant defects: an in vitro study on native pig mandibles.数字容积断层成像在种植体周围缺损诊断中的应用:对天然猪下颌骨的体外研究
J Periodontol. 2006 Jul;77(7):1234-41. doi: 10.1902/jop.2006.050424.
7
Bone reactions to longstanding functional load at implants: an experimental study in dogs.植入物长期功能负荷下的骨反应:一项在犬类中的实验研究
J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Sep;32(9):925-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00747.x.
8
Diagnostic parameters for monitoring peri-implant conditions.用于监测种植体周围状况的诊断参数。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19 Suppl:116-27.
9
Longitudinal peri-implant clinical responses in anterior mandibles of female patients: a preliminary report.女性患者下颌前部种植体周围的纵向临床反应:初步报告。
J Prosthet Dent. 1999 Jun;81(6):689-95. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70108-3.
10
Accuracy and precision in the radiographic diagnosis of clinical instability in Brånemark dental implants.Brånemark种植牙临床稳定性的放射诊断准确性与精确性
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995 Dec;6(4):220-6. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1995.060404.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Periapical radiographs vs cone beam CT imaging for the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects: an ex vivo study.根尖片与锥形束CT成像在评估种植体周围骨缺损中的应用:一项体外研究
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2025 May 1;30(3):e322-e332. doi: 10.4317/medoral.26777.
2
[Validity of digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography in the detection of peri-implant bone defects: ].[数字化根尖片和锥形束计算机断层扫描在种植体周围骨缺损检测中的有效性:]
Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2023 Mar 26;11(1):e141. doi: 10.21142/2523-2754-1101-2023-141. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
3
Evaluation of the different exposure parameters for the accurate diagnosis of peri-implantitis severity in digital panoramic radiography.
评价数字化全景片在准确诊断种植体周围炎严重程度方面不同曝光参数的作用。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023 Jan 1;28(1):e16-e24. doi: 10.4317/medoral.25501.
4
Diagnostic accuracy of imaging examinations for peri-implant bone defects around titanium and zirconium dioxide implants: A systematic review and meta-analysis.钛和二氧化锆种植体周围种植体周围骨缺损影像检查的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2021 Dec;51(4):363-372. doi: 10.5624/isd.20210120. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
5
Etiology and Measurement of Peri-Implant Crestal Bone Loss (CBL).种植体周围嵴顶骨吸收(CBL)的病因及测量
J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 1;8(2):166. doi: 10.3390/jcm8020166.
6
Clinical Assessment of Dental Implant Stability During Follow-Up: What Is Actually Measured, and Perspectives.临床评估种植体稳定性随访:实际测量内容及展望。
Biosensors (Basel). 2018 Jul 13;8(3):68. doi: 10.3390/bios8030068.
7
The comparison of the precision of different dental radiographic methods in mandibular peri-implantary measurements: an in vitro study.不同牙科放射成像方法在下颌种植体周围测量中的精度比较:一项体外研究。
J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2015 Jan 31;49(1):1-9. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.55134. eCollection 2015.