Christensen L V, McKay D C
Cranio. 1997 Jan;15(1):10-20. doi: 10.1080/08869634.1997.11745989.
Using the mouth as an "in vivo articulator," the bilateral nonmasticatory ("empty") contact patterns of opposing cuspid and first molar teeth were determined in two healthy subjects with well-defined cuspid function and two healthy subjects with well-defined group function. The electronically recorded "empty" contact patterns pertained to the static intercuspal position and dynamic laterotrusion to the right and the left. On the basis of the "empty" tooth contact patterns and the number of electronically recorded masticatory cycles of one masticatory sequence, we postulated two simple models that attempted to predict the masticatory ("functional") tooth contacts of one sequence of unilateral mastication of apple and banana. Statistical comparisons between the predictions of the two models and the actual ("functional") contacts of in vivo mastication showed that the models predicted fairly well the observed tooth contacts on the nonchewing-side of the mouth, but not the observed tooth contacts on the chewing-side of the mouth. In consequence, "empty" (nonmasticatory) tooth contact patterns should not be equated with "functional" (masticatory) tooth contact patterns.
以口腔作为“体内咬合器”,在两名尖牙功能明确的健康受试者和两名组牙功能明确的健康受试者中,确定了对侧尖牙和第一磨牙的双侧非咀嚼(“空咬”)接触模式。电子记录的“空咬”接触模式与静态牙尖交错位以及向右侧和左侧的动态侧方咬合有关。基于“空咬”牙齿接触模式以及一个咀嚼序列的电子记录咀嚼周期数,我们提出了两个简单模型,试图预测苹果和香蕉单侧咀嚼一个序列的咀嚼(“功能”)牙齿接触情况。对这两个模型的预测与体内咀嚼实际(“功能”)接触之间的统计比较表明,模型能较好地预测口腔非咀嚼侧观察到的牙齿接触,但不能预测口腔咀嚼侧观察到的牙齿接触。因此,“空咬”(非咀嚼)牙齿接触模式不应与“功能”(咀嚼)牙齿接触模式等同。