Ang K K
Department of Radiation Oncology, UTMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
Int J Radiat Biol. 1998 Apr;73(4):395-9. doi: 10.1080/095530098142220.
Progress in radiation science led to the development of two classes of biologically sound fractionation schedules for the treatment of head and neck cancers. These altered fractionation regimens are referred to as hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation schedules. Hyperfractionation exploits the difference in fractionation sensitivity between tumours and tissues manifesting late morbidity and only minor variations exist among regimens tested. In contrast, accelerated fractionation attempts to reduce tumour proliferation as a major cause of radiotherapy failure. Although there are major permutations, the existing schedules can conceptually be grouped into two categories, namely pure accelerated fractionation and hybrid accelerated regimens, depending on whether there are concurrent changes in other fractionation parameters. The results of completed phase III clinical trials addressing different types of altered fractionation schedules in head and neck carcinomas are summarized and examined in this review paper. The data from trials on hyperfractionation regimens applying 10-15% total dose increment consistently revealed a 10-15% improvement in the local control rate of a subset of intermediate-stage carcinomas without increasing the incidence of late complications. The available data on accelerated fractionation regimens already showed that tumour clonogen proliferation is a major cause of radiation failure. However, completed studies revealed that a 1-1.5 week treatment acceleration without total-dose reduction, achieved by administering 2 Gy fractions six times per week or concomitant boost schedule, yielded a 15% higher tumour control rate without increasing late toxicity. Shortening the overall time to below 2 weeks with an associated total-dose reduction did not seem to improve the tumour control rate but might decrease some late normal-tissue injury. A weekly dose accumulation rate of > or =14 Gy or delivery of three fractions of 1.6 Gy per day, with a 6 h interval, without total-dose reduction was found to increase morbidity significantly. Further treatment refinements are being pursued based on these findings.
放射科学的进展促成了两类用于治疗头颈癌的合理生物分割方案的发展。这些改变分割的方案被称为超分割和加速分割方案。超分割利用了肿瘤与表现出晚期并发症的组织之间在分割敏感性上的差异,并且在测试的方案中仅有微小差异。相比之下,加速分割试图减少肿瘤增殖这一放疗失败的主要原因。尽管存在主要的排列组合,但根据其他分割参数是否同时改变,现有的方案在概念上可分为两类,即单纯加速分割和混合加速方案。本文综述并研究了已完成的针对头颈癌不同类型改变分割方案的III期临床试验结果。关于总剂量增加10 - 15%的超分割方案的试验数据一致显示,一部分中期癌的局部控制率提高了10 - 15%,且未增加晚期并发症的发生率。关于加速分割方案的现有数据已经表明,肿瘤克隆原增殖是放疗失败的主要原因。然而,已完成的研究表明,通过每周给予6次2Gy分割或同步推量方案在不降低总剂量的情况下将治疗加速1 - 1.5周,可使肿瘤控制率提高15%,且不增加晚期毒性。将总治疗时间缩短至2周以下并伴随总剂量降低似乎并未提高肿瘤控制率,但可能会减少一些晚期正常组织损伤。发现每周剂量累积率≥14Gy或每天给予3次1.6Gy分割且间隔6小时且不降低总剂量会显著增加发病率。基于这些发现,正在进行进一步的治疗优化。