Ang K K
Department of Radiation Oncology, U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Semin Radiat Oncol. 1998 Oct;8(4):230-6. doi: 10.1016/s1053-4296(98)80020-9.
Advancement in radiobiological concepts has led to the development of two classes of new fractionation schedules for the treatment of head and neck cancers. These altered fractionation regimens are referred to as hyperfractionation and accelerated fractionation schedules. Hyperfractionation exploits the difference in fractionation sensitivity between tumors and normal tissues manifesting late morbidity. In contrast, accelerated fractionations attempt to reduce tumor proliferation as a major cause of radiotherapy failure. Although there are many permutations in accelerating radiation treatment, the existing schedules can be conceptually grouped into two categories, pure accelerated fractionations and hybrid accelerated regimens, depending on whether there are concurrent changes in other fractionation parameters. The results of 10 completed phase III clinical trials addressing different types of altered fractionation schedules in head and neck carcinomas are examined and summarized in this review article. The data of trials on hyperfractionation regimens applying 10% to 15% total dose increment over the standard 66 to 70 Gy consistently revealed a 10% to 15% improvement in the local control rate of a subset of intermediate-stage carcinomas without an appreciable increase in the incidence of late complications. The available data on accelerated fractionation regimens showed that tumor clonogen proliferation is a major cause of radiation failure. Completed studies, however, revealed that a 1- to 1.5-week treatment acceleration without total dose reduction achieved by administering 2-Gy fractions 6 times per week or concomitant boost schedule yielded an approximately 15% higher tumor control rate without increasing late toxicity. Shortening the overall time to less than 2 weeks with an associated total dose reduction did not seem to improve tumor control rate, with an exception perhaps for a small subset of patients with laryngeal carcinomas, but might decrease some late normal tissue injury. A weekly dose accumulation rate of 14 Gy or greater, or delivery of 3 fractions of 1.6 Gy/d, with 6 hour intervals, without total dose reduction, was found to increase morbidity beyond the acceptable level. Further treatment refinements building on these findings are being pursued.
放射生物学概念的进展促使了两类用于治疗头颈癌的新分割方案的发展。这些改变分割的方案被称为超分割和加速分割方案。超分割利用了肿瘤与表现出晚期并发症的正常组织之间在分割敏感性上的差异。相比之下,加速分割试图减少肿瘤增殖这一放疗失败的主要原因。尽管在加速放射治疗中有许多排列组合,但现有的方案在概念上可分为两类,即单纯加速分割和混合加速方案,这取决于其他分割参数是否有同时的变化。本文综述并总结了10项已完成的针对头颈癌不同类型改变分割方案的III期临床试验结果。关于超分割方案的试验数据显示,在标准的66至70 Gy基础上总剂量增加10%至15%,持续表明中期癌亚组的局部控制率提高了10%至15%,而晚期并发症的发生率没有明显增加。关于加速分割方案的现有数据表明,肿瘤克隆源性细胞增殖是放疗失败的主要原因。然而,已完成的研究表明,通过每周给予6次2 Gy分割或同步推量方案在不降低总剂量的情况下将治疗加速1至1.5周,可使肿瘤控制率提高约15%,且不增加晚期毒性。将总治疗时间缩短至不到2周并伴有总剂量降低,似乎并未提高肿瘤控制率,可能喉癌的一小部分患者除外,但可能会减少一些晚期正常组织损伤。发现每周剂量累积率为14 Gy或更高,或每6小时间隔给予3次1.6 Gy分割且不降低总剂量,会使发病率增加到可接受水平以上。基于这些发现的进一步治疗改进正在进行中。