• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为预付费人群采购和管理肿瘤服务的协作方法。

Collaborative approaches to purchasing and managing oncology services for a prepaid population.

作者信息

Hennings M N, Rosenthal D S, Connolly D A, Pollack M N, Lynch M M

机构信息

Harvard University Health Services, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 1998 May 15;82(10 Suppl):2026-34. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10+<2026::aid-cncr9>3.0.co;2-a.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10+<2026::aid-cncr9>3.0.co;2-a
PMID:9587102
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Change created by managed care plans is producing tensions among oncology care providers, health plans, patients, and employers. Managed care plans, which now are dominant, are engendering concern among some patients and providers because those plans limit provider choice and reimbursement, as well as inject themselves in clinical decision-making. Collaborative approaches to purchasing and managing oncology service for a prepaid population should help reduce these tensions.

METHODS

This article provides a case history of how Harvard University Health Services, a managed care delivery and insurance program serving the university collaborates with contracted oncology providers. The described approach defines mutually beneficial payment and shared responsibility for care in the context of patient centered values. As a part of this collaborative effort, liberal experimental treatment coverage is offered.

RESULTS

Patient care is improved because the flow of clinical information among caregivers is improved. When communication is more open, nurse case managers who work for the managed care plan also can arrange for covered services in a more expeditious manner.

CONCLUSIONS

Collaboration among health plans, oncologists, and other health care providers to provide patients with high quality, cost-effective care on a fully informed basis is challenging, but not impossible. The key is to define common ground and commitment to the needs of patients among health plans and providers.

摘要

背景

管理式医疗计划带来的变革正在肿瘤护理提供者、健康计划、患者和雇主之间引发紧张关系。如今占主导地位的管理式医疗计划引起了一些患者和提供者的担忧,因为这些计划限制了提供者的选择和报销,还介入临床决策。为预付费人群购买和管理肿瘤服务的协作方法应有助于缓解这些紧张关系。

方法

本文介绍了哈佛大学健康服务中心的案例,该中心是一个为大学提供管理式医疗服务和保险的项目,它与签约的肿瘤护理提供者进行合作。所描述的方法在以患者为中心的价值观背景下,定义了互利的支付方式和共同的护理责任。作为这项协作努力的一部分,还提供了广泛的实验性治疗覆盖范围。

结果

患者护理得到改善,因为护理人员之间的临床信息流通得到了改善。当沟通更加开放时,为管理式医疗计划工作的护士个案经理也能够更迅速地安排承保服务。

结论

健康计划、肿瘤学家和其他医疗保健提供者之间进行协作,以便在充分知情的基础上为患者提供高质量、具有成本效益的护理,这具有挑战性,但并非不可能。关键是在健康计划和提供者之间确定共同点,并致力于满足患者的需求。

相似文献

1
Collaborative approaches to purchasing and managing oncology services for a prepaid population.为预付费人群采购和管理肿瘤服务的协作方法。
Cancer. 1998 May 15;82(10 Suppl):2026-34. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10+<2026::aid-cncr9>3.0.co;2-a.
2
Designing a system for managing the performance of mental health managed care: an example from New York State's prepaid mental health plan.设计一个心理健康管理式医疗绩效管理制度:以纽约州的预付费心理健康计划为例。
J Behav Health Serv Res. 1998 Aug;25(3):269-78. doi: 10.1007/BF02287466.
3
Trying to beat the odds. Minn. providers to launch health plan despite statistics.试图战胜困难。明尼苏达州的医疗服务提供者不顾统计数据仍要推出健康计划。
Mod Healthc. 1998 Dec 7;28(49):20.
4
Mainstreaming contraceptive services in managed care--five states' experiences.将避孕服务纳入管理式医疗——五个州的经验
Fam Plann Perspect. 1998 Sep-Oct;30(5):204-11.
5
Oncology services for members of a national managed care company.为一家全国性管理式医疗保健公司的会员提供肿瘤学服务。
Cancer. 1998 May 15;82(10 Suppl):2039-42. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10+<2039::aid-cncr11>3.0.co;2-c.
6
Health plans' success mixed in managing cancer care programs.
Manag Care. 2014 Sep;23(9):32-4.
7
Awakening consumer stewardship of health benefits: prevalence and differentiation of new health plan models.唤醒消费者对健康福利的管理意识:新型健康保险计划模式的普及与差异
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1055-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00273.x.
8
Managed care, primary care, and quality for children.儿童的管理式医疗、初级保健与质量
Curr Opin Pediatr. 1996 Apr;8(2):164-70. doi: 10.1097/00008480-199604000-00015.
9
A government purchaser perspective: TennCare--strengthening the safety net.
Cancer. 1998 May 15;82(10 Suppl):2000-2. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19980515)82:10+<2000::aid-cncr4>3.3.co;2-#.
10
The consequences of paying Medicare managed care plans their costs.向医疗保险管理式医疗计划支付其费用的后果。
Inquiry. 1998 Summer;35(2):210-22.