Debus A G
Morris Fishbein Center for the Study of the History of Science and Medicine, University of Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Isis. 1998 Mar;89(1):66-81. doi: 10.1086/383922.
Positivism in the history of science and medicine was challenged by Walter Pagel more than fifty years ago. He sought to understand early modern figures such as Harvey, Paracelsus, and van Helmont by looking at all their work, including nonscientific material generally ignored by other scholars. Of special importance in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries was the chemistry found in the writings of Paracelsus and his followers. These "chemical philosophers" offered a new philosophy based on chemistry and chemical analogies that was to replace the works of the ancients. As physicians, they debated first with Galenists and Aristotelians and later with mechanists. The essay argues that these debates were an essential chapter in the development of the Scientific Revolution and important for understanding the Chemical Revolution of the eighteenth century.
五十多年前,科学与医学史上的实证主义受到了沃尔特·佩格尔的挑战。他试图通过研究哈维、帕拉塞尔苏斯和范·海尔蒙特等早期现代人物的所有作品来理解他们,这些作品包括其他学者普遍忽视的非科学材料。在16世纪和17世纪特别重要的是帕拉塞尔苏斯及其追随者著作中的化学。这些“化学哲学家”提出了一种基于化学和化学类比的新哲学,以取代古人的著作。作为医生,他们首先与盖伦派和亚里士多德派进行辩论,后来又与机械论者进行辩论。本文认为,这些辩论是科学革命发展中的重要篇章,对理解18世纪的化学革命也很重要。