Gray J M
University of California, Los Angeles 90033, USA.
Am J Occup Ther. 1998 May;52(5):354-64. doi: 10.5014/ajot.52.5.354.
This article addresses a difficulty that many occupational therapists experience: maintaining occupation as the core of their therapeutic intervention. This difficulty not only results from but also contributes to occupational therapy's struggle with professional identity. Current manifestations of the problem are described as component-driven practice and the narrowing of occupation to basic activities of daily living. The concepts of occupation as ends and occupation as means are proposed as a practical solution to guide treatment planning and merge remediation and adaptation within a single occupational session. Each concept is investigated in terms of its history within the profession and its usefulness for analyzing and solving therapeutic problems. These concepts are discussed as useful guidelines to help occupational therapists not only in their clinical decision making but also in their understanding and expression of the field's unique expertise. A case example, applying occupation as ends and occupation as means to evaluation and treatment, is presented.
将职业作为其治疗干预的核心。这一难题不仅是职业治疗在职业认同方面挣扎的结果,也加剧了这一挣扎。该问题目前的表现形式被描述为以组成部分为驱动的实践,以及将职业狭义地定义为日常生活的基本活动。文章提出了“职业即目的”和“职业即手段”的概念,作为指导治疗计划制定以及在单一职业治疗环节中融合补救与适应的切实可行的解决方案。文章从这两个概念在该专业领域的历史发展,以及它们对分析和解决治疗问题的实用性这两个方面进行了研究。这些概念被视为有用的指导方针,不仅有助于职业治疗师进行临床决策,还能帮助他们理解和表达该领域独特的专业知识。本文还给出了一个案例,展示了如何将“职业即目的”和“职业即手段”应用于评估和治疗。