• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“黄金分割”:刺激范围与需求特征的人为现象。

The 'golden section': an artifact of stimulus range and demand characteristics.

作者信息

Piehl J

出版信息

Percept Mot Skills. 1976 Aug;43(1):47-50. doi: 10.2466/pms.1976.43.1.47.

DOI:10.2466/pms.1976.43.1.47
PMID:958835
Abstract

Rectangles haveing different ratios between the lengths of their sides were presented in three different ranges: with the golden section either (a) the next to most elongated rectangle, (b) the middle rectangle, or (c) the next to shortest rectangle. Each of 90 subjects had to pick the rectangles they liked best from all three ranges. This basic procedure was run under three different conditions: (a) subjects did not know the stimuli before, (b) subjects knew them from a foregoing psychophysical experiment, (c) the same, with reinforcing the golden section. The rectangles at both extremes of each range were chosen first most often under the first two conditions, whereas the golden section was chosen most often under the last condition. The conclusion is that preference for the golden section is an artifact of the stimulus range and of the demand characteristics of the experimental procedure rather than of any intrinsic aesthetic quality.

摘要

呈现出不同边长比例的矩形被分为三个不同范围

黄金分割矩形要么是(a)第二细长的矩形,(b)中间的矩形,要么是(c)第二短的矩形。90名受试者中的每一个都必须从所有三个范围中挑选出他们最喜欢的矩形。这个基本程序在三种不同条件下进行:(a)受试者之前不知道这些刺激物,(b)受试者从之前的心理物理学实验中了解它们,(c)同样的情况,但强化了黄金分割。在前两种条件下,每个范围两端的矩形最常被首先选中,而在最后一种条件下,黄金分割矩形最常被选中。结论是,对黄金分割的偏好是刺激范围和实验程序的需求特征造成的假象,而非任何内在审美品质的体现。

相似文献

1
The 'golden section': an artifact of stimulus range and demand characteristics.“黄金分割”:刺激范围与需求特征的人为现象。
Percept Mot Skills. 1976 Aug;43(1):47-50. doi: 10.2466/pms.1976.43.1.47.
2
The 'golden rectangle': some new data.“黄金矩形”:一些新数据。
Am J Psychol. 1976 Dec;89(4):737-43.
3
The golden section: the "true" ratio?黄金分割:“真正”的比例?
Percept Mot Skills. 1978 Jun;46(3 Pt 1):831-4. doi: 10.2466/pms.1978.46.3.831.
4
The 'golden section': an artifact of stimulus range and measure of preference.“黄金分割”:刺激范围的人为产物与偏好度量
Am J Psychol. 1974 Mar-Jun;87(1-2):269-77.
5
The golden section hypothesis.黄金分割假说。
Am J Psychol. 1980 Sep;93(3):467-87.
6
Consistency in the expression of aesthetic preference in line partitioning.线条分割中审美偏好表达的一致性。
Percept Mot Skills. 1997 Jun;84(3 Pt 2):1151-4. doi: 10.2466/pms.1997.84.3c.1151.
7
Testing the aesthetic significance of the golden-section rectangle.
Perception. 2000;29(12):1413-22. doi: 10.1068/p3037.
8
Fechner's aesthetics revisited.重新审视费希纳的美学。
Seeing Perceiving. 2010;23(3):263-71. doi: 10.1163/187847510X516412.
9
The aesthetics of simple figures.简单图形的美学
Br J Psychol. 1980 Nov;71(Pt 4):505-24. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1980.tb01763.x.
10
Adults and 5-year-old children draw rectangles and triangles around a prototype but not in the golden ratio.成人和 5 岁儿童围绕原型绘制矩形和三角形,但不按黄金比例绘制。
Br J Psychol. 2013 Aug;104(3):400-12. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.2012.02129.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The golden ratio as an ecological affordance leading to aesthetic attractiveness.黄金比例作为一种生态可供性,导致了美学吸引力。
Psych J. 2022 Oct;11(5):729-740. doi: 10.1002/pchj.505. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
2
Aesthetic judgment of triangular shape: compactness and not the golden ratio determines perceived attractiveness.三角形形状的审美判断:紧凑性而非黄金比例决定了感知到的吸引力。
Iperception. 2012;3(3):163-75. doi: 10.1068/i0484. Epub 2012 Mar 16.