• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Cesarean section rates: effects of participation in a performance measurement project.

作者信息

Kazandjian V A, Lied T R

机构信息

Center for Performance Sciences, Inc., Lutherville, MD 21093-6087, USA.

出版信息

Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Apr;24(4):187-96. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30371-6.

DOI:10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30371-6
PMID:9589331
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A decade-old indicator-based research initiative, Maryland's Quality Indicator (QI) Project, analyzed data for cesarean section rates among its approximately 1,100 voluntarily participating hospitals. It was posited that continuous participation in this performance measurement initiative would be associated with decreased primary and repeat C-section rates.

METHODS

A retrospective study compared a group of 110 hospitals that reported on the C-section indicator continuously between 1991 and 1996 with a group of hospitals that did not continuously report data on the C-section rate.

RESULTS

Among the 110 continuously participating hospitals in the QI Project, the total C-section rate declined from 22.5% in 1991 to 19.4% in 1996 (p < .01). For this same group, the primary C-section rate declined from 15.8% to 13.9% (p < .01), and the repeat C-section rate declined from 75.0% to 61.2% between 1991 and 1996 (p < .01). The comparison group of 957 hospitals that did not continuously participate in C-section reporting between 1991 and 1996 did not experience a statistically significant difference in total C-section rates during this time (from 21.2% in 1991 to 20.7% in 1996). In attempting to investigate alternative explanations for these results, a subsequent analysis of eight hospital variables potentially related to cesarean delivery rates found no significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides support for the positive association between continuous participation in a performance measurement project and performance improvement.

摘要

相似文献

1
Cesarean section rates: effects of participation in a performance measurement project.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Apr;24(4):187-96. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30371-6.
2
Risk adjustment for inter-hospital comparison of primary cesarean section rates: need, validity and parsimony.剖宫产率医院间比较的风险调整:必要性、有效性和简约性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Aug 15;6:100. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-100.
3
Using the continuous quality improvement process to safely lower the cesarean section rate.运用持续质量改进流程以安全降低剖宫产率。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1999 Dec;25(12):619-29. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(16)30476-x.
4
The labor-adjusted cesarean section rate--a more informative method than the cesarean section "rate" for assessing a practitioner's labor and delivery skills.劳动调整剖宫产率——一种比剖宫产“率”更具信息量的方法,用于评估从业者的分娩技能。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jul;177(1):139-43. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70452-6.
5
Lowering the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: comparison of individual physicians' rates, risk factors, and outcomes.降低私立医院的剖宫产率:个体医生的剖宫产率、风险因素及结局比较
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;178(6):1207-14. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(98)70324-2.
6
Risk-adjusted measurement of primary cesarean sections: reliable assessment of the quality of obstetrical services.剖宫产率的风险调整测量:产科服务质量的可靠评估。
Qual Manag Health Care. 1999 Fall;8(1):47-54. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199908010-00006.
7
The effect of public accountability on hospital performance: trends in rates for cesarean sections and vaginal births after cesarean section in Cleveland, Ohio.
Qual Manag Health Care. 1999 Winter;7(2):1-10. doi: 10.1097/00019514-199907020-00001.
8
Risk adjustment for interhospital comparison of primary cesarean rates.剖宫产率院间比较的风险调整
Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Jun;93(6):1025-30. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00536-5.
9
The effect of physician factors on the cesarean section decision.医生因素对剖宫产决策的影响。
Med Care. 1995 Apr;33(4):365-82. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199504000-00004.
10
The cesarean decision in New York State, 1986. Economic and noneconomic aspects.
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):529-40. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00006.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions targeting healthcare providers to optimise use of caesarean section: a qualitative comparative analysis to identify important intervention features.针对医疗保健提供者的干预措施以优化剖宫产术的使用:确定重要干预特征的定性比较分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 14;22(1):1526. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08783-9.
2
Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section.减少不必要剖宫产的非临床干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;9(9):CD005528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005528.pub3.
3
Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review.
利用罗伯逊分类法进行审核和反馈以降低剖宫产率:系统评价。
BJOG. 2018 Jan;125(1):36-42. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14774. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
4
Randomized trial of enhanced profiling in substance abuse treatment.随机试验增强式滥用药物治疗方案。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):96-104. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0306-z.
5
How to effectively implement an indicator system to improve performance from a management perspective: the case of Taiwan Healthcare Indicator Series (THIS) system.如何从管理角度有效实施指标体系以提升绩效:以台湾医疗指标系列(THIS)系统为例。
J Med Syst. 2009 Jun;33(3):215-21. doi: 10.1007/s10916-008-9182-4.
6
Performance measurement in healthcare: part I--concepts and trends from a State of the Science Review.医疗保健中的绩效评估:第一部分——科学现状综述中的概念与趋势
Healthc Policy. 2006 May;1(4):85-104.
7
Combining HEDIS indicators: a new approach to measuring plan performance.合并医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)指标:衡量计划绩效的新方法。
Health Care Financ Rev. 2002 Summer;23(4):117-29.
8
HEDIS performance trends in Medicare managed care.医疗保险管理式医疗中的医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)绩效趋势
Health Care Financ Rev. 2001 Fall;23(1):149-60.
9
Defining appropriateness: the challenge of knowing the difference.界定适宜性:辨别差异的挑战。
Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec;7(4):228-31. doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.4.228.