Monro A M, MacDonald J S
Pfizer Central Research, Sandwich, Kent, England.
Drug Saf. 1998 May;18(5):309-19. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199818050-00001.
The evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals is currently undergoing dramatic changes. For the past 25 years the regulatory expectation for agents intended for long term use has been that lifespan studies (usually lasting 2 years) in 2 rodent species be conducted. These studies take at least 3 years to plan, execute and interpret, and use over 1200 animals. It is now recognised that the quality of the information obtained from these studies is unreliable for prediction of carcinogenic risk to humans. Over the past 4 years, the International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) has recommended changes in approaches to assessing the carcinogenic potential of pharmaceuticals. In future, only one long term rodent study will be routinely required (usually in rats), provided this is complemented with a short or medium term test in one of the emerging new models for carcinogenicity, such as transgenic mice or newborn mice. However, the relevance of these new models to human cancer and their use in risk assessment is still largely unknown and this situation must be kept under review as knowledge accumulates. A long term study in a second rodent species is still an option. Dose selection has also been improved inasmuch as there are now several alternatives to the use of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). In the past, the use of the MTD, when the normal homeostasis of the test animals is disturbed, has been considered one of the major problems with the rodent carcinogenicity bioassay. However, one of the alternative end-points to the use of the MTD, i.e. the comparison of plasma concentrations in rodents and humans, must be viewed with caution. While this may contribute to limiting the high dose level for agents of very low toxicity, the concept should not be interpreted as signifying that plasma concentrations provide a sound basis for comparing the carcinogenic activity of agents in different species. Recognition of the 4 properties (genotoxicity, immunosuppression, steroid hormonal activity and long term tissue damage), at least one of which is associated with each of the pharmaceuticals known to be carcinogenic to humans, should focus more attention on a search for these properties in patients. Absence of these properties at clinically relevant dose levels indicates that a pharmaceutical is highly unlikely to be carcinogenic to humans.
药物致癌潜力的评估目前正在经历巨大变革。在过去25年里,对于长期使用的药物,监管方面的期望一直是在两种啮齿动物物种中进行终生研究(通常持续2年)。这些研究至少需要3年时间来规划、实施和解读,并且要使用超过1200只动物。现在人们认识到,从这些研究中获得的信息质量对于预测人类致癌风险并不可靠。在过去4年里,国际协调会议(ICH)已建议改变评估药物致癌潜力的方法。未来,通常只需要在大鼠中进行一项长期啮齿动物研究,前提是辅以在一种新出现的致癌性模型(如转基因小鼠或新生小鼠)中进行的短期或中期试验。然而,这些新模型与人类癌症的相关性及其在风险评估中的应用在很大程度上仍然未知,随着知识的积累,这种情况必须持续审查。在第二种啮齿动物物种中进行长期研究仍是一种选择。剂量选择也有所改进,因为现在有几种替代最大耐受剂量(MTD)的方法。过去,当试验动物的正常体内平衡受到干扰时使用MTD,一直被认为是啮齿动物致癌性生物测定的主要问题之一。然而,使用MTD的替代终点之一,即比较啮齿动物和人类的血浆浓度,必须谨慎看待。虽然这可能有助于限制极低毒性药物的高剂量水平,但不应将这一概念解释为意味着血浆浓度为比较不同物种药物的致癌活性提供了可靠依据。认识到这4种特性(遗传毒性、免疫抑制、类固醇激素活性和长期组织损伤),已知对人类致癌的每种药物中至少有一种与之相关,这应使人们更加关注在患者中寻找这些特性。在临床相关剂量水平下不存在这些特性表明一种药物极不可能对人类致癌。