• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性肺损伤动物模型之间的比较。

A comparison among animal models of acute lung injury.

作者信息

Rosenthal C, Caronia C, Quinn C, Lugo N, Sagy M

机构信息

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Schneider Children's Hospital, New Hyde Park, NY 11040, USA.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 1998 May;26(5):912-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199805000-00027.

DOI:10.1097/00003246-199805000-00027
PMID:9590322
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare four widely used animal models of acute lung injury and to determine the changes in physiologic variables associated with each model.

DESIGN

A prospective, controlled animal study.

SETTING

An animal laboratory of a university-affiliated children's hospital.

SUBJECTS

Four groups of anesthetized, paralyzed, and ventilated young Yorkshire pigs, weighing 35 to 45 kg.

INTERVENTIONS

Acute lung injury was generated by four different methods: a) intrapulmonary arterial infusion of endotoxin of Escherichia colt; b) bronchoalveolar instillation of 0.05N of hydrochloric acid; c) repeated bronchoalveolar warm saline lavage; and d) intrapulmonary arterial infusion of oleic acid. After each acute lung injury procedure, the temporal changes in various physiologic variables were measured, starting at 60 mins and at 15-min intervals thereafter for a total of 165 mins. Systemic and mixed venous serum immunoreactive tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha concentrations were also measured at the same time points. Analysis of variance for repeated measures was employed to determine the absolute and relative significance of the changes observed.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Systemic and mixed venous immunoreactive TNF-alpha did not change following any of the acute lung injury procedures. The animals' heart rates and systemic vascular resistances also did not change. Hydrochloric acid instillation as well as bronchoalveolar lavage resulted in significant hypoxemia with no other hemodynamic effects. Endotoxin infusion did not result in hypoxemia but caused significant increases in mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance and decreases in mean arterial pressure and cardiac output. Oleic acid infusion resulted in a marked hypoxemia with a pronounced increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. It also markedly reduced the mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and the mixed venous PO2.

CONCLUSIONS

The surfactant depletion and hydrochloric acid instillation models produce acute hypoxemia in an otherwise hemodynamically stable animal. A brief endotoxin infusion provides a model for cardiovascular instability and pulmonary hypertension but fails to produce hypoxemia in the pig. The oleic acid infusion creates a model of marked cardiovascular instability, pulmonary hypertension, and profound hypoxemia. However, none of the acute lung injury models described was associated with the production of tumor necrosis factor.

摘要

目的

比较四种广泛应用的急性肺损伤动物模型,并确定与每种模型相关的生理变量变化。

设计

一项前瞻性对照动物研究。

地点

一所大学附属医院的动物实验室。

对象

四组麻醉、麻痹并接受通气的年轻约克夏猪,体重35至45千克。

干预措施

通过四种不同方法引发急性肺损伤:a)经肺动脉注入大肠杆菌内毒素;b)支气管肺泡内滴注0.05N盐酸;c)重复支气管肺泡温盐水灌洗;d)经肺动脉注入油酸。在每次急性肺损伤操作后,从60分钟开始,此后每隔15分钟测量各种生理变量的时间变化,共测量165分钟。同时在相同时间点测量全身和混合静脉血清免疫反应性肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)-α浓度。采用重复测量方差分析来确定观察到的变化的绝对和相对显著性。

测量指标及主要结果

在任何急性肺损伤操作后,全身和混合静脉免疫反应性TNF-α均未改变。动物的心率和全身血管阻力也未改变。滴注盐酸以及支气管肺泡灌洗导致显著低氧血症,无其他血流动力学影响。注入内毒素未导致低氧血症,但导致平均肺动脉压和肺血管阻力显著升高,平均动脉压和心输出量降低。注入油酸导致明显低氧血症,平均肺动脉压和肺血管阻力显著升高。它还显著降低了平均动脉压、心输出量和混合静脉血氧分压。

结论

表面活性剂耗竭和盐酸滴注模型在血流动力学稳定的动物中产生急性低氧血症。短暂注入内毒素提供了心血管不稳定和肺动脉高压的模型,但在猪中未能产生低氧血症。注入油酸创建了显著心血管不稳定、肺动脉高压和严重低氧血症的模型。然而,所描述的急性肺损伤模型均与肿瘤坏死因子的产生无关。

相似文献

1
A comparison among animal models of acute lung injury.急性肺损伤动物模型之间的比较。
Crit Care Med. 1998 May;26(5):912-6. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199805000-00027.
2
Effects of the lazaroid, tirilazad mesylate, on sepsis-induced acute lung injury in minipigs.拉扎洛德(甲磺酰替拉扎特)对小型猪脓毒症诱导的急性肺损伤的影响。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Mar;26(3):538-47. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199803000-00029.
3
Accuracy of the double indicator method for measurement of extravascular lung water depends on the type of acute lung injury.双指标法测量血管外肺水的准确性取决于急性肺损伤的类型。
Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;32(3):811-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000114831.59185.02.
4
Aminoguanidine attenuates endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in rabbits.氨基胍减轻内毒素诱导的家兔急性肺损伤。
Crit Care Med. 1998 May;26(5):905-11. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199805000-00026.
5
Exogenous surfactant and positive end-expiratory pressure in the treatment of endotoxin-induced lung injury.外源性表面活性剂与呼气末正压通气治疗内毒素诱导的肺损伤
Crit Care Med. 1998 Aug;26(8):1379-89. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199808000-00025.
6
Protective effects of propofol on acute lung injury induced by oleic acid in conscious rats.丙泊酚对油酸诱导的清醒大鼠急性肺损伤的保护作用。
Crit Care Med. 2008 Apr;36(4):1214-21. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31816a0607.
7
Transient hemodynamic effects of recruitment maneuvers in three experimental models of acute lung injury.急性肺损伤三种实验模型中肺复张手法的短暂血流动力学效应
Crit Care Med. 2004 Dec;32(12):2378-84. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000147444.58070.72.
8
Effects of adenosine on cardiopulmonary functions and oxygen-derived variables during endotoxemia.腺苷对内毒素血症期间心肺功能及氧衍生变量的影响。
Crit Care Med. 1998 Feb;26(2):322-37. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199802000-00036.
9
Nitric oxide production after acute, unilateral hydrochloric acid-induced lung injury in a canine model.
Crit Care Med. 1998 Dec;26(12):2042-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199812000-00038.
10
Synergistic hemodynamic effects of low-dose endotoxin and acute lung injury.低剂量内毒素与急性肺损伤的协同血流动力学效应
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jun;157(6 Pt 1):1919-26. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.157.6.9704110.

引用本文的文献

1
Recruitment-to-inflation ratio reflects the impact of peep on dynamic lung strain in a highly recruitable model of ARDS.复张-充气比反映了在高度可复张的急性呼吸窘迫综合征模型中,呼气末正压对动态肺应变的影响。
Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Jul 4;14(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01343-w.
2
A Semi-quantitative Scoring System for Green Histopathological Evaluation of Large Animal Models of Acute Lung Injury.一种用于急性肺损伤大动物模型绿色组织病理学评估的半定量评分系统。
Bio Protoc. 2022 Aug 20;12(16). doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.4493.
3
Enhancing Extracellular Adenosine Levels Restores Barrier Function in Acute Lung Injury Through Expression of Focal Adhesion Proteins.
提高细胞外腺苷水平通过粘着斑蛋白的表达恢复急性肺损伤中的屏障功能。
Front Mol Biosci. 2021 Mar 10;8:636678. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.636678. eCollection 2021.
4
A comparison of four different models of acute respiratory distress syndrome in sheep.四种不同羊急性呼吸窘迫综合征模型的比较。
Respir Res. 2020 Aug 8;21(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01475-0.
5
Regulatory T Cells and Acute Lung Injury: Cytokines, Uncontrolled Inflammation, and Therapeutic Implications.调节性T细胞与急性肺损伤:细胞因子、失控性炎症及治疗意义
Front Immunol. 2018 Jul 9;9:1545. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01545. eCollection 2018.
6
Characterization of the seven-day course of pulmonary response following unilateral lung acid injury in rats.大鼠单侧肺酸伤后 7 天肺部反应过程的特征。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 4;13(6):e0198440. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198440. eCollection 2018.
7
Difficulties in modelling ARDS (2017 Grover Conference Series).急性呼吸窘迫综合征建模的难点(2017年格罗弗会议系列)
Pulm Circ. 2018 Apr-Jun;8(2):2045894018766737. doi: 10.1177/2045894018766737. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
8
The Emulsified PFC Oxycyte Improved Oxygen Content and Lung Injury Score in a Swine Model of Oleic Acid Lung Injury (OALI).乳化氟碳氧红细胞能提高油酸型肺损伤(OALI)猪模型的氧含量和肺损伤评分。
Lung. 2016 Dec;194(6):945-957. doi: 10.1007/s00408-016-9941-9. Epub 2016 Oct 4.
9
Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) for quantification of pulmonary edema in acute lung injury.用于急性肺损伤中肺水肿定量的电阻抗断层成像(EIT)
Crit Care. 2016 Jan 22;20:18. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1173-5.
10
Effect of hypertonic saline treatment on the inflammatory response after hydrochloric acid-induced lung injury in pigs.高渗盐水治疗对猪盐酸诱导肺损伤后炎症反应的影响。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2015 Aug;70(8):577-83. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2015(08)08.